Adamek vs Klitschko - September

I'd prefer you start answering my questions instead of this clowning. However, it seems to me that the Ruiz fight is the only one out of four Haye had in HW that you are excited about. Do you realise how irrational you look with your 'Wlad's boring' statements?

 

I think this was more brutal Ruiz beating but you have a right for a opinion just as anyone else.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FZ4ZlT63xU"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FZ4ZlT63xU[/ame]

 

You mean it was as exciting as watching Wlad knock down a prime Barrett four times en route to a TKO win eight years before Haye fought the 38 year old version?

Or as "exciting" as Wlad wiping the floor with Byrd knocking him down half a dozen times in two fights?

You see all this bull**** goes two ways. You may think Haye beating up old nobodies is exciting because you are a fans of his and you love him. That's fine, that's why we all love boxing.

I am not attached to Haye at all and don't find his fights against over-matched old nobodies exciting at all. His crap HW fights are about as much or little exciting as seeing the brothers batter their overmatched opponents.

 

I remember telling some Haye fans here on the site that Tua knocked out Ruiz in the first round 14 years prior to Haye beating up a shot version, I got no reply :deal

 

Exactly my logic.

 

Bible channel SKY probably forgot to mention that.

Edit: As they probably did with this trivia as well:

2000-2010 Ruiz fought 16 times with 8 wins and had 2 TKO's against 19-10-1 and 25-18-1 guys.

That's Haye's best and most exciting win.

 

When facts undermine their religious faith in Haye, they prefer to run and hide until their 'mana' gets restored to its usual blinding zeal via consumption of tabloids and talk shows. They they show up in full swing again

 

No not at all, he is ****ing boring, always has been. The Chris Byrd was barely interesting because Byrd wasn't very good, a very weak champion who didn't have the strength or power to deal with either Klitschko. Watching Wlad beat up a guy who should've really been a cruiserweight is entertaining for you, but not for everone else.

The Barrett fight was a decent Klitschko fight, and the Sam Peter was a very exciting fight and probably the most exciting fight of Wlad's career that he actually won, but every fight after that was boring. Calvin Brock was a half-decent opponent, half-decent fight. After that? Austin? boring. Brewster II? boring. Ibragimov? most boring fight ever. Thompson? Boring. Rahman? A waste of time. Chagaev? Dull as ****. Every fight since the first Sam Peter fight has been dull, safety first, and that's the way guys fight after they've been battered senseless like Wlad was. Who's wlad's legacy defining fight? Sam Peter? Corrie Sanders? Chris Byrd? It's hardly stellar. At least Vitali Klitschko has that war with Lennox to cling to, he gets respect for that.

Besides you're making this out that I'm some huge Haye fanboy, that's not really true either, it's not as if I'm incapable of being critical of Haye like some of the people are toward the Klitschko's on here.

 

Yes the fight is confirmed. Adamek will have one more fight in april before wlad though. He will reveal his opponent "soon".

 

Note the use of the word SUSTAINED. You think I've not seen the Tua fight :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

Tua battered Ruiz, no question, that's just Tua isn't it though, one left hook and game over. What I'm trying to say is after a lengthy career, which was far more successful than Tua's, how many guys gave John Ruiz a brutal 9-round long beatdown???

 

Wow! Have you ever criticized any Lennox fight? I'm old enough to remember that Brits had pretty harsh opinions of his fights as well before he retired. I don't like Haye at all but it doesn't make me blind for his cruiser fights. They're actually good stuff but even a most devoted Haye fan has to notice how bad his opponents has been in heavies. Besides Valuev they're plain awful by record and actual performance.

 

I haven't caught a glimpse of criticism of Haye on your part. Only justifications and accusations of the Klitschkos. You find them boring - fair enough, but they have fought the best opponents available to them. This is why they are legit and established beltholders. Now, what has Haye achieved during his HW campaign? Referring to the facts, ONE win (a majority decision) over a top 10 HW - Valuev, previously more effectively defeated by Chagaev who should be considered a real WBA beltholder. And that's ****ing it. The boxrec tells David Haye's story, and with all honesty it's far from impressive especially compared to the claims and promises he's been making along the way. How much of them came true? I want to hear it from you, a Haye fan.

 

Ruiz is the best opponent at Heavyweight, even if he was well past his best, and the performance was good too. Real speed, power and movement. You won't see a heavyweight throwing those kinds of combinations against for a long time. Valuev was a freakshow and never a boxer on Haye's league and the fight was boring, although I hardly blame Haye for this. yeah I am disappointed with Haye's heavyweight career, the Harrison fight was bull****, but that's the way it goes. No point crying over spilt milk.

 

ha wont fight haye,wont go to england.

will fight adamek,will go to poland.

o dear.

 

Adamek was hurt and only scraped past the fossil of Michael Grant. Wlad is a huge fraud if he doesn't KO him in a *maximum* of two rounds.