Adamek vs Mormeck, who would win?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by geppy, Apr 21, 2008.


  1. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    i wouldnt say it's "good" but not glass either. bell had him out on his feet several times in the rematch. he was running for his life in the last 3 rounds. but, i think his stamina may be the biggest factor. i still dont think he takes punches too well
     
  2. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    People picking Mormeck by KO are ****ing kidding themselves. Adamek is a FAR superior fighter to Mormeck, who constantly puts his head down, has poor movement, and really needs to be right inside to be effective. Adamek would totally box his ears off, and has an unreal chin. There is no way Mormeck would KO him. Adamek has one of the best chins in boxing, you guys need to watch more fights before posting, you really look silly with some of these predictions.
     
  3. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    I like the avatar.
     
  4. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    fuk this avatar

    only two more to go after this one :D
     
  5. geppy

    geppy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    Yeah, I seen his fight against Ulrich. Adamek did box nicely, that is true. In all of Adamek's big fights though, (Briggs twice and Dawson), Adamek went toe to toe alot.

    What Adamek fights should I watch? It seems he had alot of easy fights.
     
  6. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    I watched a couple of his earlier fights before he took on Briggs, can't remember the names though. One American guy, whom Adamek totally dominated, just brutally outboxed him. The most noteable ones though are the Ulrich fight, the Briggs fight and the few fights he has had since moving to Cruiser. Even against Briggs, he still boxed. He got drawn into wars though by getting hit with too many right hands. Briggs is VERY explosive though, and has very nice, straight punches. Mormeck throws winging shots, and needs to be in close to deliver. Totally different fighters. Against Briggs, Adamek still used great lateral movement, nice combination punching and moved off his jab well. It was his DEFENCE that let him down, and forced him at times to trade. He has worked on this a lot by the looks of things, which has improved him as a fighter. Anyway, point being he has always relied on his boxing skills, he has never been a Gatti type fighter. Against Bell, i think he just fought a guy who matched up very nicely, and was hyped from fighting for so long in a very weak division. I am not suprised at all that Adamek won, the guy has great skills. I think Cruiser has been very weak for a long time, and have never really been impressed by any of the current crop apart from Haye. Braithewait and Co are absolutely woeful, i don't understand how these guys could ever be title holders. p4p they wouldn't even be contenders in most divisions.
     
  7. geppy

    geppy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    The ESPN Classic broadcast crew kept saying that Adamek said he was going back to his amatuer style. Adamek himself said that he was changing his style for this fight (Bell), I don't know what to tell you. You disagree with Tomasz about his fighting style? (That he didn't change)
     
  8. geppy

    geppy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    I do agree though that top CW's are woefully bad. David Haye was at the right place at the right time to make a name for himself.

    Haye vs Enzo was a battle of two glass chinned punchers. I was sure who ever landed first was going to win. Mormeck is only a 6 to 8 round fighter, then he is done.