Didn't Adamek look pretty bad in his last fight? And wasn't that like an 8 or 10 rounder? Just wondered to make a realistic and neutral opinion.
Remember that when you're taking Bell in H2H comparison you have to take in count that he have fought only two times in over two years, he was chasing his sparringpartner with a ****ing hatcet and he was lost in a ****ing forrest while jogging! Guy has serious head problems!
Adamek tends to perform more consistently that Bell. If Adamek performs at his best for the full 12 rounds I think that Bell will lose heart.
Adamek was schooled by Dawson but he still manadged to knock him down and win the last 3 rounds. Dawson is WAY better than Oneil Bell though. Also Adamek struggled mightily to make weight for the Dawson fight, he is 6'2 1/2 and looks well at 200lbs.
Dale Brown didnt accompish much and he did it. Bell can crack and has a good chin but his run as the Undisputed Champ was semi lucky.
Dominated every minute of every round i dont know how he looked bad. Aside from not KO'ing a guy who has never been KO'd i saw nothing wrong with his performance.I did however only see RD1 5 and 8.
