Add Steward to growing list of people against the catchweight king

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PBFred, Aug 26, 2010.


  1. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Quote doesn't make sense. There's nothing stupid about it, if that's what Steward said, he's talking absolute bollocks. What's the source for this anyway?
     
  2. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    I'm being serious, Pretty Boy Fred. Steward wants Manny to come in exactly at that catchweight limit? He thinks Manny weighing lower is unreasonable?
     
  3. PBFred

    PBFred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,057
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    B-news24. Don't believe I am allowed to post the link.

    He probably could have worded it better but it's clear that he is against asking fighters to fight for belts at a weight lower than the weight limit specified in the class.
     
  4. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    If pac doesnt feel that fighting in a higher weightclass can suit him then he should not fight in that weight division, certainly not if it is for a title.

    on the orherhand the fighters are only taking these catchweights to put food on table and money in the bank.

    as they couldnt have any other big money options.
     
  5. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Oh ok, I found the article now.

    I see that, despite Steward's quote making no sense, you refrained from posting the most ******ed quote from the article.

    Yes, it's Uncle Roger again:

    "“He’s been fighting under weights that he challenges at. He didn’t fight Oscar (delaHoya), Ricky (Hatton), or Cotto (Miguel) at 147. He’s always weighing in less and had them drain their bodies to make weight. It’s like cheating.”

    Does anyone want to point out to Unc Rog that Pacquiao did fight DLH at 147, and that the reason he fought Hatton at 140 is because that's Hatton's ****ing weight. You know the one in which he's fought his whole career and was lineal champion in...

    And do you know what is actually 'like cheating'? I'll give you a clue, it isn't coming in at or below the contracted maximum weight that both fighters have agreed to, it's coming in four pounds heavier :deal
     
  6. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    I just choose to ignore anything and everything he says...ever.
     
  7. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    I want to see this list
     
  8. PBFred

    PBFred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,057
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    Of course I am only going to quote what suits my agenda :hey

    140 is/was Ricky's best fighting weight but, come on, you can't honestly say that at that point in his career, it was healthy for him to gain and drop all of that weight all the way down to 140. He looked like a skeleton against Pacquiao.

    Can anybody confirm the rehydration clause rumors? According to some articles and speculation, Cotto and DLH were not allowed to weigh in above 147 on fight night and Hatton was not able to weigh more than 140.

    I wonder if Margo agreed to a similar clause?
     
  9. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Ok I get what he's trying to say. Yep I agree with him. Nothing wrong with catchweight fights themselves, but trying to claw a title at the same time is wrong.
     
  10. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    6
    Mar 14, 2007
    I don't understand why Mayweather fans play up the catchweight issue. In two of his last three fights, Mayweather forced his opponent to move up to a different weight class where they're not as good at all. Isn't that a lot worse than meeting them halfway, which is what Pacquaio has been doing?

    A rehydration clause is just rumor and nothing else. The commissions wouldn't sanction the fights if they had that. It would be a threat to safety of the fighters. A 10-pound rehydration limit is legal, but not a no-rehydration limit.
     
  11. PBFred

    PBFred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,057
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    PBFred
    Uncle Roger
    MannY Steward
    All other unbiased boxing fans
     
  12. left right left

    left right left Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,748
    1
    Aug 14, 2010
    Delusion at its finest.
     
  13. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    Hatton wanted to challenge Mayweather at 147lbs...thats why he moved up in the first place.
    Marquez wanted to pursue Pacquiao for a third bout...and I'm not defending the Marquez v Mayweather bout.

    The Marquez bout was a catchweight...but wasn't for a title.
     
  14. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    6 months before, Ricky fought at his usual aggressive pace when smacking Malignaggi around the ring. He had no conditioning issues during that bout at 140. And in his preperation for the Pacquiao fight, Ricky ensured an extended training camp so he could drop weight comfortably. He'd been doing the same thing all his career, and not once looked fatigued in the ring. But against Pacquiao where he barely even got going, it suddenly caught up with him? Bull****

    Nobody can confirm....because it's all bull****! :twisted:
     
  15. cainne

    cainne Noli Mi Tangere Full Member

    436
    0
    Jul 9, 2010
    Add steward to a growing fans of duck called *****s.