Admitting favouritism on here!

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Gudetama, Jun 4, 2018.


  1. Gudetama

    Gudetama Active Member Full Member

    1,037
    914
    Sep 11, 2017
    I am 37 years old. But I really favour the Old-Timers. It clouds my judgement. But that is not the biggest bias I have. I really love a great story. The Listons. The Ketchels. The Langfords, etc. I'm a sucker for a good story. It really taints my opinions.
    I don't expect many replies to this thread. Many people will just think that they: A) are so far above it. B:) do not want to let their guard down. C:) do not want to undermine their future debates.
    I understand that. I'm just saying... We are all only human.
    We are all fans of the sport we adore. The tendency towards getting personal, or setting up threads to undermine others, or just spouting crap...
    Actually, I feel completely honoured if I see some of you guys reply to my threads. I completely understand that you know more than me. That's why I joined.
    If we take personal emotion out of it, and leave all to boxrec, etc ... Well you know what I'm saying.
    Best wishes.
     
    JoffJoff, Clinton, Bukkake and 6 others like this.
  2. BlackCloud

    BlackCloud I detest the daily heavyweight threads Full Member

    3,201
    3,373
    Nov 22, 2012
    Fair dues buddy!
    We all have our favourites obviously.
    Some of us even have our religious obsession.
    Christ, some on here even know what the hell they are talking about!
     
    surfinghb, mcvey and Colonel Sanders like this.
  3. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,266
    15,329
    Jun 9, 2007
    I get it. It's hard to go against the guys you grew up watching for yrs and yrs or guys you have read and studied about and know everything about. I readily admit that these things have clouded my opinions and judgments. I dont deny it.
    I try am rise above it most of the time but we know how it is and we all have favorites for a reason because we swear they are the best.
    My 2 cents. Nothing to hide. Never will
     
    surfinghb, mcvey and BlackCloud like this.
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think i'm biased against heavyweights in pound-for-pound arguments, I have to be very careful of it.

    I just think that the smaller guys do boxing better, and there's a sweet spot where dangerous knockouts remain possible but they're still small enough to be absolutely brilliant.

    Contrarily, heavyweight contests in the here and now are often my favourites.
     
  5. GOAT Primo Carnera

    GOAT Primo Carnera Member of the PC Fan Club Full Member

    2,665
    2,687
    Jan 28, 2018
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    At 105 there aren't a lot of huge KO's.

    At middleweight there are.
     
  7. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,424
    Aug 22, 2004
    As long as we can all agree that heavyweights and any modern fighters are lesser creatures, I have zero problem with it.
     
    Colonel Sanders likes this.
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well I wouldn't set out to do so in this thread.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    Very difficult but yeah it would be interesting.
     
    Colonel Sanders likes this.
  10. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    Being a Texan, I think Roy "Cut & Shoot" Harris, should be ranked right
    behind Jack Dempse
    y...in the annuals of Heavyweight Boxing.
    LOL !

    Note: How Cut and Shoot, Texas got its name:

    The community of Cut and Shoot, is located in the northeastern part of Montgomery, County, in Southeast Texas. It had its unusual beginning and acquired its peculiar name in July 1912.

    On the morning of July 21, 1912 the group who wanted to hear Preacher Stamps, gathered at the Community House. They came in their wagons and buggies and brought their lunches with intentions of staying and having an all day preaching and a dinner on the ground. Under their wagon and buggy seats they had their guns and knives rolled up in quilts. On their arrival they found the door of the building locked, and soon after the opposing group arrived with their weapons. This faction immediately inspected the door and declared that the lock had been jammed, whereupon all grabbed their guns and a hot argument developed between two of the opposing families.
    While the accusations of both sides flew back and forth, the eight-year-old son of one of the families favorable to the meeting became frightened at the disturbance and said; "I'm scared!" "I'm going to cut around the corner and shoot through the bushes in a minute!" Thus the name Cut and Shoot was coined.

    http://www.cutandshoot.org/documents/history.htm
     
  11. BlackCloud

    BlackCloud I detest the daily heavyweight threads Full Member

    3,201
    3,373
    Nov 22, 2012
  12. The Senator

    The Senator Active Member Full Member

    570
    857
    Dec 10, 2017
    I have no shame in admitting that I give every benefit of the doubt to older fighters in H2H and ATG discussions more often than not. One of my problems is that my favorites list is a long one. I admire fighters going from Sullivan and Peter Jackson to Dempsey and the Black Dynamite crew, to Louis, Charles, Walcott, Marciano, Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Tyson and so on and so on. To me, the arc of history is fascinating and the more I dig, the more things I find to admire about the greats.

    That's not to shoot down the people who carry on the lineage, fighting for our current day entertainment. I respect them a great deal as well, but their story hasn't ended, and they haven't yet fully stepped into the grand legend that their predecessors now inhabit.

    And that's before I even get to the lower weights, ah, Duran, Gans, Leonard, Ray Leonard, SRR, Pep, Saddler, Chavez, Saad Muhammad, Hopkins, those two warriors in my avatar, that's a whole other topic in itself.
     
    choklab likes this.
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    Better at executing boxing skill. For example, combination punching. So i we look at Sugar Ray Robinson throw combination punches it looks more beautiful, faster, fluid to me.

    Guys like Ray Leonard looks more beautiful, faster, more fluid than Holmes, say, even Ali looks less indescribable to me than someone like Pep.

    So yeah, from the purely "technique is just affectiveness" perspective you have (i nearly wrote suffer:lol:), you're right, but to me there's considerably more to boxing than that.

    That's true.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, I agree with this. That's what separates sport from art, unquestionably. But - and i'm not sure what other sports you watch - but it's known and accepted that it is better to win like this:

    This content is protected


    Than like this:
    This content is protected


    Though someone somewhere will always say "it's the three points that count" and that would be technically correct.

    Each boxing match will be a contest. Some contests will be more brilliant than others. The most brilliant tend to be at weights lower than heavyweight.
     
  15. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    What’s nonsensical about the list?