Adonis would KO kovalev

you don't know what explosive means.

 

y'all keep acting like kovalev and stevenson have the same capabilities except that kovalev has more....dude they are two COMPLETELY different fighters. with completely different strengths. it don't matter that stevenson is one handed fighter...you think everybody doesn't know that by now? they still get dropped and KO'd byt that SAME one-handed guy. i don't think you guys ever been in the ring...y'all show no understanding of this sport.

 

so, what i hear you saying is, you've NEVER been wrong on a prediction? is that what i hear? you NEVER picked the wrong guy? if i go back and look at your old posts, i won't find that you picked, say donaire to beat rigo? or pac to beat marquez in IV?...

your dumbass knows you're wrong ALL THE TIME!...stupid mfker. so, what does it matter what your particular method of picking losers is?

and fyi, im picking GGG to beat monroe....i picked kovalev to beat agnew. i picked ggg to beat adama. i mean, i was rooting for those other guys to win, but i knew what was up with those fights. so, you need to have a coke and a smile and stfu about things you know nothing about.

 

i think i'ma have to start cutting and pasting repeat responses to some of these posts. i will say it again for the thousandth time...yes, the neo-nazi is the better boxer...he has tons more experience. however, there are certain things adonis brings to the table that will offset the neo-nazi's strengths. those things are: his much longer reach, his far greater speed his southpaw style and his one punch ko power. plus he can fight...where adonis might lack dimensions to his game that the neo-nazi has, the neo-nazi's critical vulnerability is he is very slow and easy to hit. i don't think the neo-nazi is slick enough to avoid stevenson's lightning quick left for long. it'll land and it'll be lghts out.

 

i don't know how to respond to this kind of stupidness... stupidity like yours tends to wear me down because my natural tendency is to want to have a normal debate. but i'ma help you out here...put yourself in the position of the judges at ringside while the fight was actually going on. how do you know exactly how many punches russell landed and exactly how many lomachenko landed? where does that information come from? I know, youre gonna say "cereal, you ignoramus, you turn on HBO and follow the fght with the expert commentary." but my point is, maybe the judges don't have the benefit of that information...maybe the viewing audience at home is watching the fight just like the judges, seeing one guy throw TWO HUNDRED MORE PUNCHES than the other guy and maybe judging rounds on what they see. also, maybe JUST MAYBE, the compubox numbers might not be what you think they are....compubox is not an exact science...it's some dude sitting behind a computer watching the same fight and deciding to press or not to press a button...whichever button it is.

so, in conclusion, obviously you are correct. loma landed twice as many punches and it's dumbasses like me who, in scoring the fght couldn't see that obvious fact...on behalf of dumbasses everywhere, i beg your pardon sir and may god have mercy on your soul.

 

gdm...i just figured it out. what you're saying is, the judges are supposed to count the punches by both fighters....that way they will have an accurate tally by the end of the fight. i understand you now.

i don't think that will work, though....and the reason is, the judges are watching the fight for many different things...offense, defense, ring generalship, etc. so, i don't think they would be able to do all those things and at the same time score the fight accurately. but you do raise a good point. we definitely need to hold these judges to account when they score a fight a draw or 8-4 and compubox shows one guy landing more than twice as many punches as the other guy.

 

caparella decked kovalev.