I do rate Maidana but he is beatable but for the reasons i have stated, Broner matches up bad with him. Broner will take another loss from Maidana. Broner will look amazing vs some opponents but not guys like Maidana at WW. Just out of interest, are you a kind of Boxing fan that if someone loses, they are automatically ****?, regardless of whatever they do afterwards?. ( Maidana has bounced back well from losses but you still are more bothered about his losses for example) You seem a very harsh critic, but you are entitled to an opinion.
Losing is part of sports. Losing doesn't make you **** to me. How you lose and who you lose to does carry some weight to me though. The Alexander loss was a terrible loss IMO. Terrible, it wasn't even competitive, I just kept watching to see if Alexander would stop him or if Marcos would quit. Ok, so Marcos bounced back, but again, to me losing THAT BADLY to a C+ fighter doesn't spell a bad night to me. I just think he isn't that good. Secondly Marcos beat a "hype job", so besides the fact that people don't like Broner, what is there to celebrate really? It's not like he battered JMM, he beat a guy crowned the future of the sport who had done nothing to deserve those accolades and who was coming up from 135 ffs. Marcos should have won and looked good, but what is that really worth considering the consensus is that Broner is garbage? I'm not really a harsh critic, I just call it like I see it. I think Marcos is an ok fighter, not great by any means though.
the reason why everyone is happy is because no one like broner and we wanted to see him get his ass kicked! and maidana did just that!:yep
only blackboys hyped broner and they knew deep down he was a bum fraud but he was stupidly their black hope
All evidence says Maidana is actually the better boxer not Broner. Is Broner better because he's "slicker" even though he's not even slicker? Nonsense.