Adrien Broner is P4P #6, how is this possible?

The simple answer is that the p4p list mean **** all when its only a propaganda vechicle for GBP

 

I used to like him a lot before his last fight but now I'm not convinced anymore. Broner must win top opponents to be considered top 6. He could be but not in this moment.

 

You talk about "elite skills".

Elite skills can only be showcased if you are fighting elite fighters.

And in who's qualified opinion is a pound for pound list all about skills? I've always believed it to be a combination of resume, performance and the general size of your opponents.

 

"Potential" has a lot to do with this ranking.
(Benefit of the doubt that he pans out)

 

#6 according to whom? If its Ring Magazine rankings we're talking about, that means jack **** now that Golden Boy owns it.

 

This content is protected

 

Because his list is build from american nutthugers.

 

:deal


Broner will lose to malinaggi

 

Thats why the p4p lists dont mean ****

 

yea thats bs broner dont deserve that yet. in the future rightfully so he can get there but right now its not him

 

:roll: If he ever did, Ring would then have to put Malignaggi in Broner's previous rank....

 

people actually defending this are deluded idiots

 

Not necessarily, Luke.

I think Broner has tons of potential, but I wouldn't consider myself a fan at all, really. Floyd has nothing to do with it for me. He was also several levels above Broner at the same age.

 

Yea ok. Doing the shoulder roll while beating on weak opposition who he out weights by a huge amount is not called "Elite SkillZ".