Adrien Broner Titles Vs Terence Crawford Titles

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by melo9100, Oct 4, 2015.


  1. melo9100

    melo9100 Active Member Full Member

    1,319
    41
    Feb 23, 2010
    Terence Crawford:

    Alejandro Sanabria -34-1-1- Vacant WBO NABO lightweight title

    Ricky Burns -36-2-1- WBO World lightweight title

    Thomas Dulorme -22-1-0- Vacant WBO World super lightweight title

    Adrian Broner:

    Martin Vicente Rodriguez -34-2-1- Vacant WBO World super featherweight title

    Antonio DeMarco -28-2-1- WBC World lightweight title

    Paul Malignaggi -32-4-0- WBA World welterweight title

    Khabib Allakhverdiev -19-1-0- Vacant WBA World super lightweight title

    Facts! If you think Broner is a paper champion, then Terence Crawford is a super paper champion. He has not faced nor beaten the same level of competition as Adrien despite being 2 years older.

    2 of his titles were Vacant! against guys who weren't previous title holders.


    His 140 title was vacant! He won by knocking out Dulorme after losing the first 5 rounds. Yet people have the nerve to say Broner got a gift title lol

    Keith Thurman has never even won a title. He was elevated.

    Errol Spence has yet to fight a top 20 fighter.

    Amir Imam has yet to fight a top 15 fighter.

    But they're so great right? Keep in mind they are all the same age. Except for Crawford 28
     
  2. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    Titles don't mean **** anymore.

    Crawford is more skilled than Broner.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,532
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    Crawford was the true LW champion. 1 vs 2 contest.

    When he beats Postol the same will be true again.

    Crawford is a champion. Broner is a title holder.
     
  4. melo9100

    melo9100 Active Member Full Member

    1,319
    41
    Feb 23, 2010
    Really? So Broner wasn't the true lightweight champion? Didn't he brutally knock out Demarco who was ranked number 1 at the time? Hell the title Crawford beat Burns for was the belt Broner was stripped of when he moved up to welterweight.
     
  5. melo9100

    melo9100 Active Member Full Member

    1,319
    41
    Feb 23, 2010
    Based on what? Do you think Crawford could beat Maidana, or Porter? If not then STFU. Broner has better resume period. He would still be undefeated if he fought Crawfords resume.

    Crawford is much bigger than Broner, but no one says he picking on little guys. Crawford wins vacant titles, but no one calls him a paper champion. GTFO.
     
  6. vnyc

    vnyc Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,078
    638
    Nov 8, 2009
    Crawford is a very good boxer , broner is a bum , you can't compare these two
     
  7. Stuarty

    Stuarty Member Full Member

    123
    15
    Mar 29, 2013
    No it isn't. Burns was WBO champ and Broner was WBC champ.
     
  8. TinFoilHat

    TinFoilHat Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,740
    403
    Sep 29, 2013
    Burns, Dulorme are probably better than anyone Broner has beaten. Crawford did it with ease. He also beat Gamboa, who is also better than anyone Glass Chinned boy Broner has fought.

    Broner can win some stuff at 135 to 140, he always will be able to pick up belts, but I think he will lose to true champions.
     
  9. TPB90

    TPB90 Active Member Full Member

    642
    4
    Aug 18, 2015
    It's a shame that this fight is unlikely to get made. Crawford would prove who is the more skilled fighter.
     
  10. melo9100

    melo9100 Active Member Full Member

    1,319
    41
    Feb 23, 2010
    Your right. Burns won the wbc after he lost to Crawford.
     
  11. melo9100

    melo9100 Active Member Full Member

    1,319
    41
    Feb 23, 2010
    Delusion! Demarco was rated #1 when Burns had the WBO title. Dulorme is nothing. He has done nothing. Khabib is a former champion. And Emmanuel Taylor has better wins than Dulorme.
    And i would favor Molina to knock Dulorme out with his weak ass chin. Terence gave up 4-5 rounds to him, it was not easy. Neither was his win over Gamboa, he lost rounds against him too! Gamboa is a real 126.

    You guys are full of emotion. Never facts. "When the hate doesn't work you start telling lies"
     
  12. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,274
    5,897
    Oct 5, 2009
    Some thoughts

    Broner has been exposed and had some career hiccups but i think 140 is a good weight for him and last night was a solid victory

    He has some dangerous fighters around him though
     
  13. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super Oneā„¢ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    Please don't compare bum Broner to a legit fighter like Crawford.

    What's next? Anthony Dirrell compared to Joe Calzaghe :patsch
     
  14. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,398
    240,980
    Nov 23, 2013
    Agree, I've been saying for months how overrated Crawford's resume is.
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,532
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    It's the division he has the best claim in, certainly, but whether he was ever number 1 (him or de marco) depends on which ranking body you look at. Crawford was a consensus number 1 after beating Burns then that guy who broke Burns jaw.

    No that's not true at all.