Younger, less miles on the clock. Ditto Medina. Ditto Johnson. But I was actually saying, put Broner in with ANYONE that Scot Harrison fought , whether he won, lost or drew, put them at their PEAK and tell me which one beats Broner. How was McCullough a better version against Scot than against Hamed out of interest ?
If you also look back I said Hamed won against a better version than Scot lost to. Quite clearly that referred to Medina , not McCullough.
I must agree Billy, Sadly alot of brits kick our guys in the balls before they have a chance, yet as you say blow steam up American boxers arses, it must be some rear guard reaction
Abelyan. I wouldnt say McCullough was better or worse against Scotty than against Hamed, I would argue he was much the same at that point Riggers.
Id actually watch this . . . . . But only if they include Harrisons first defeat at the hands of . . . . Miguel Mathews :deal
atsch Harrison was a slow skillless plodder albeit in great shape who picked on smaller men while avoiding the best in his division. Even then he got beat by Polo and Medina Broner is no great boxer, but he's far faster, bigger and far more skilled
FFA Dunky watch the fight mate! What happened is in the past I've moved on a done well I'm content,you need to take your blinkers off ha ha
I disagree mate Scott was a great talent and to this day he knows every square inch of a ring,that's done to his talent and good coaching he could put opponents in positions in a ring without punching just by ciutting the ring off with great footwork
Fair enough, are you his trainer Billy, I don't want to disparage what you achieved But I always did pick Scott to be taken apart at the top level if he'd have got in with Morales, Barrera, Pacman, Marquez or Guzman. Guzman would be a nightmare style, Broner wouldn't be a good style either Now Harrison-Chi, that would be a good match up when both held titles, I'd give him a shot there