After Pacquaio, who will be the next fighter of the decade?

I saw your rope skipping video though. Could you post that again?

 

LOL According to the May/Pac vid you made, I thought that Stats provided by HBO could not be trusted. Or are there other stats to look at from another source? Let me guess, the stats are dead on accurate when they favor your favorite fighter but, when they don't, it's a rigged system. LOL I don't know man, you're looking pretty weak!

 

lol What was that all about? Do you have a television show on the BBC? If not, you should.

 

Architect? lol You are the man! Oh, I see. "Body" architect. Now it makes sense.

 

Dummy! Manny was the HBO fighter and May was with Showtime fighter! Lampley has very little respect for Mayweather as he stated as much on his show, The Fight Game on HBO. So why would HBO cheat or skew the stats in favor of the competing networks fighter? Explain that!

 

I'm done with the ped subject. If you think he took them, more power to you. That's your opinion and you're entitled to it, but as of now it is not a fact known to anyone outside of mayweather and his camp.

As to being a great offensive fighter, he use to be one, it's really that simple. Bringing up fights at 147 and 154 don't detract from my statement. Not to mention, for maidana and PAC, mayweather was way past his best. He's old for a fighter, it's as simple as that. The Mosley fight Shane had 2-3 moments in one round then the offense was pretty much all mayweather so I'm not sure how he didn't hang with him.

I said before lacy he had one good win. I thought it was obvious that Eubank was that win, but I guess not.

Hatton had plenty of hype and praise over here in the states, and if he is as garbage as you say he is then doesn't that sort of nullify your argument that white fighters don't get the benefit of the doubt compared to black ones? After Lennox I'm pretty sure the consensus has been the best hws are the klit brothers.

Mayweather is one of the most popular boxers in recent years, but he received plenty of criticisms, some of which being warranted. That 2 year break hurt his legacy and I'm not sure if anyone doesn't fault him for that. But those who claim his career is a complete sham filled with mediocre wins are off their rockers. Only those looking back with revisionist history can make that claim. I'll say again, anyone can pick apart almost any fight in history and find someway to spin it and make it fit an agenda.

Disclaimer, none of these are my opinion just examples which support my statement.

Hopkins was in his 40s when he lost to joe. He was well past his best at the time of the fight.

Cotto and margarito were completely drained going into their fights with pacquiao. Had the fights been held at non catch weights the outcomes may have been different.

Srl loss to Duran was a result of him trying to beat Duran at his own game. If he would have came in the way he did for the rematch srl would have produced a win.

Despite a hunk of flesh hanging off his eye, had the klit fight with Lewis continued, Lewis would have lost.

 

Well, you learn something every day. I thought a "Bogan" was a Scottish name for a hobgoblin, but it appears that Australians use the word to describe an unrefined person who's speech, clothing, and attitude are distasteful.

 

Far from new to boxing, but your claim that Hopkins and mayweather are the same in terms of when they hit their primes is absurd. Hopkins is an exception, not the rule. His trajectory as a boxer is not something that happens multiple times within a generation, in fact you could argue that he is the only fighter to have improved beyond the age of, and I'm spitballing here, say 35. After Hatton, mayweather clearly showed signs of regression. His speed, reflexes, stamina and footwork all diminished with each fight. This is extremely detrimental to his style of fighting which relied heavily on his ability to counter and slip away, throw combinations (something that disappeared during the odlh fight), and perform his pull back counter which is a dangerous move to begin with but coupled with a slower execution is a recipe for disaster (see the second maidana fight I believe). The exception to this is his fight with Canelo where his legs looked to be fully there, or at least close. Chalk that up to a boxers "One more good fight" theory. Aside from that, he had to adjust, and he did so when he became a boring yet effective fighter. He basically employed the rope a dope technique because he just didn't have the athleticism to do what he use to. Simply just watch some of his older fights, it's as clear as day he progressively slowed down.

Honestly, you really need to stop with this nonsense about American judges and bias views. Plenty of nationality neutral scorers gave mayweather the nod. Get over it. Mayweather won and did so in the eyes of the non agenda driven individuals.

 

Oh my God! lol This guy just days anything to sound right..lol I've never heard even the craziest Floyd haters come up with the insane crap that you post when someone ask a good question that kills your assumption.. I would honestly wouldn't even blink anymore if you said Floyd is the true leader of the illuminati and the world is working for him...lol