After Pacquiao beats Hatton who should he fight?

completely diferent fighters.
Pac has unfinshed business with JMM and we need a third fight between the,after that he can fight Floyd if by then Floyd isnt still retired.

 

whatever...

still, i'd rather see a pac-pbf tussle rather than jmm again...believe me the majority would agree....

 

by majority you mean the *******s and the Floydtoys.

 

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=129452

 

And?

 

yeah and those people who pays for the seat in the venues, meaning the casual fans not the boxing purist....

 

just gave you a thread to give you an idea on how people thinks about pac fighting floyd. you can either dismiss it or make your own poll.

 

you slow or what?

 

considering that most people here dont know WTF theyre talking about including the nutthugger that posted before me,that doesnt mean much.

either way Pac-JMM 3 is the fight i would like to see if you want to see him fight Mayweather its your opinion and i respect that.

 

For Pac i think he should fight Marquez first because the people still feel he has unfinished buisiness...if was to fight PBF though it would be a big money fight but i wanna say Pac will try to out work Floyd in which he could but i think floyd just has too many ways to throw him off his game plan and too many ways to win...it would be a tough tough fight for Pac.

 

shut the **** up nutthugger you want to see him fight Floyd cause youre delusional and think he can beat him,guess what thats not going to happen deal with it groupie.

 

don't get me wrong, as a boxing fan jmm-pac3 is the way to go. no weight disadvantage on either side, a chance for a conclusion of a great rivalry, a fight between the two best active and p4p boxers on the planet. but as a pac fan, beating floyd would give pac more legacy points than beating jmm. it would also appeal to some boxing fans because it would settle who between floyd and pac is the fighter of this decade though pac is in a size disadvantage here.

for casual fans, a fight between floyd and pac would appeal more because the two were proven PPV stars already.

 

i see what you mean for me the best option would be to see the third fight between Pac and JMM to remove any doubts about whos the best fighter in the world meanwhile Floyd would take a tune up fight and then he would fight the winner of Pac-JMM.

you should know that if Maywether fights Pac without a tune-up and somehow loses everyone would make excuses saying that Pac beat a rusty Mayweather and all that BS and wouldnt give Pac any credit , they would also say that hes ducking JMM.

 

good post especially the one i put in bold. i agree with floyd taking a tune-up fight first but knowing floyd, he would not waste time fighting tune-ups again. he would probably go straight to pac, jmm or mosley if he comes back. so why not pac taking advantage of the situation when it happens?

i don't know if people would accuse pac of ducking jmm if he fights floyd. floyd is not only the bigger money-option but also more popularly accepted as the better fighter not to mention the size advantage. if floyd comes back and chooses to fight jmm people would not complain that jmm would be fighting a rusty floyd instead they would commend jmm for taking the huge challenge.

but your right that at hindsight, if pac somehow edges floyd, all the BS would appear like floyd was rusty, unmotivated etc. same could be said with jmm that if pac wins convincinly this time, excuse could fly like jmm was already too old and has too many wars.

 

Heard that there is a hidden clau9se in contract that Hatton V Pac ll (If competitive) will be staged @ Wembley end of the year.