After the dust has been settled, do some people here still think pac is not that good

Remember..his opponent has got to be of African-American origin, NOT AFRICAN.

 

I don't think people don't rate him, I just think that many people for some bizarre reason still see Pac as the raw and rather one-dimensional threshing machine that he was in the first Barrera and first Morales fights. These guys saw those fights, formed an opinion, and so passed judgement in their minds, meaning they are just not appreciating the astounding rate of development in Pacquiao these days. Pacquiao may not have the defensive skills of a Mayweather, but the current version is a far better offensive boxer. His movement, footwork and accuracy mean that he now is a skilled, elusive and all-round magnificent boxer. I feel certain he will prove this beyond all doubt to every boxing fan in the world over the next year or two.

 

Should be the haters.

He already beat the fighters he was suppose to lose to . . . he has his #1 fighter rating . . . what more?

I'm not saying he is unbeatable but he should be rated higher than good. :deal

 

Don't really care what anyone thinks bruh..kid did his job in style.. end of story.

 

ahahahaha what the ****? Are you making this argument or are you making fun of it?

 

I'm dead serious. He still hasn't fought the 'slick' style or the true sweet science.

 

Why is Hatton suddenly now swept aside and tagged, *overrated*?

Merely because Pacquiao beat him?

How wacky is that reasoning. :blood

Hatton is, and was, Hatton; one of the absolute best fighters today. But Pacquaio proved he's even better than someone as good as Hatton..........End of story.

 

This content is protected

 

so who are we talking here, exactly?

besides Mayweather?

 

That excludes Guzman. He's not an Afro American. Poor guy!

 

The caption fails bigtime but that is some diligent work!

 

Timothy Bradley, Nate Campbell, Zab Judah, Kendall Holt...all are worthy opponents to fight the Great Manny Pacquiao.