Umm no. Did you not see me reference the Lazcano fight repeatedly. Where Hatton got nearly stopped by a B- level opponent? Which was nearly 4 years ago. Hatton has clearly lost a step since then, considering the same shots that Zoo landed did not effect Hatton and the same shots that Lazcano hit him with did. If you watched more then 1 boxing match a year you would know that.
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl Please. Floyd would beat Hattons ass worse in a rematch. And no, it wasnt Floyd landing one great punch, it was Floyd decking Hatton repeatedly in the face with sharp hard crisp punches over a period of 10 rounds that ended Hatton. Its called accumulation of damage. The brain cant take being bounced around in the skull for that long before goes to sleep. Hatton won 2 rounds at best, wake up. his defense is terrible, against a strong puncher he's in trouble, just like he was in trouble against Collazo, just like he was in trouble against Mayweather and just like he was in trouble against Lazcano.
Jesus christ. You point out that Hatton got lit up by jabs and kept falling into the counter hook and these guys act like we just called him a bum or something. All im saying is, he runs into a fighter who can punch with that weak defense and come forward at all costs styles, and he wont be saved by the ref telling him to tie his shoe laces next time.
wow you picked a tko after the round paulie was holding on for dear life, your an amazing analyst.atsch
PAULIE has no POWER I agree but I don't that's the ONLY reason why Paulie lost to HATTON! Congrats to HATTON! May be fight the winner of pac vs dlh... or maybe even if pac losses coz it's defenitely going to be interesting fight! pac vs hatton :good
The guy rightly points out that you are a clueless ****er and you go and 'dis' him!!! The truth sure does hurt!:rofl
Here goes Gazprom another Fatbot who thinks a rematch with PBF is the next viable step in boxing politics (oh and just because hatton is british):roll: