after Whitaker, who is the greatest of past 20 years

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by the cobra, Jul 2, 2008.


  1. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    RJJ's P4P opponents: James Toney. Toney was considered a top 4 P4P by nearly everyone when RJJ dominated him. It's the best win of his career.

    PBF: Ricky Hatton. Hatton was a top 10 in most people's eyes when Floyd KTFO Hatton. Corrales & Castillo would later occasionally come up into the top 10, but neither were when they fought PBF.

    Sweet Pea: Julio Cesar Chavez. Buddy McGirt. Azumah Nelson. Chavez was considered along with Pea to be a top 2 P4P, with most picking Chavez before their fight. Buddy McGirt was a top 5 P4P when Pea took the lineal 147lbs title from him, and did not drop from top 5 until his 2nd loss to Whitaker, in which he was outclassed. Azumah Nelson was a top 10 P4P when Pea clearly outpointed him, he dropped off after the draw with Fenech, but came back in when he KTFO Fenech.
     
  2. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    like to elaborate about that draw with fenech or are you picking and choosing?
     
  3. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006
    H2H jones was the best followed by whitaker. then lennox lewis IMO
     
  4. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Elaborate on Nelson-Fenech draw? sure, Nelson got a bull**** gift in a fight he lost. That's why he was dropped out of the top 10. They had a rematch, Nelson dominated, and then KTFO Fenech. He then came back in the top 10. Sorry man, I just asumed that any knowledgable boxing fan knew what happened there.
     
  5. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Or alternatively, if you want to unequivocally prove yourself the best in your division, you will take risks to prove it.

    Jones didn't need to take the fight because he was already recognised as the best in the division, but it would have helped his legacy if he did go over there and fight Dariusz (and won, or got robbed - obviously it wouldn't have helped if he lost).
     
  6. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    boxing is a business too though..

    that's why 'european champs' don't get shots at the big boys unless they earn it. you should know this by now.


    anyone - and i mean anyone - who wants to milk their european 'legacy' and call it...whatever....can either make the jump and take on the best in the world or they can sit back and talk about it.

    but don't sit there and try to put the blame on the man who is legitimately the best in the division (or the world) and try to bridge that gap by saying "oh..but he has to come to my fighter to prove it...".

    he doesn't have to prove anything since he had to get there on his own in the first place...

    if you have someone in mind who YOU THINK deserves a shot at the title - then you know where he is and there is no excuse for not going after him, unless it's a fight you think you can't win.

    i was always taught to put my balls on the line and it's something i've always done - come what may.

    that's really what i'm talking about here.
     
  7. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    How did Dariusz not earn it? He was beating all the other lightheavies not named Jones for years, not just euro trash.


    .Dariusz had less standing than Jones, so he should have been more willing to prove that he's the man in the division than Jones, who already had that mantle, but at the end of the day, Jones did not fight the best fighter available at the weight, and you can't deny that, and that's something Jones has to contend with.
     
  8. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    The problem with RJJ never fighting DM is that DM was THE champion of the division. He beat Hill after Hill unified the division and before RJJ beat Hill, and obviously some people are commenting about what they don't know, because DM clearly beat Hill. I beleive Roy would have beaten him, But DM was a talented and skilled boxer. He was no Svenn Ottke if that's what your trying to imply.

    That's not the reason why Sweet Pea was the greater fighter though. RJJ was faster and had more power, but every single thing else a boxer should be able to do goes to Whitaker. Footwork, chin, versatility, jab, technique, etc.

    Pernell has an edge in how they performed against truly elite fighters, how they performed against all the world class guys they fought, and how they each fared when both lost what made them dominant. At the stage of RJJ's career where he was being pasted by Tarver & Johnson, Whitaker was losing a close and controversial decision to a prime ODLH and then going all 12 rounds with a prime Trinidad. If you want to count who was more willing to fight the best as a catagory too, then that's another one Sweet Pea wins.

    Despite how ultra-talented RJJ was, and despite his HOF and ATG worthy career, he doesn't have an edge over Whitaker in any catagory that decides who was the greater fighter.
     
  9. eliqueiros

    eliqueiros Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    7
    Oct 25, 2007
    Oscar won that fight. Most people remember it as Whitaker winning because of all the Whitaker highlights they keep watching. Watch the unedited fight and you will see Oscar wins, though close. Plus, the knockdown was anything but great as Oscar was off balance from changing stances, it doesn't even look as if Whitaker hit him with his fist but more like the side of his arm. Quartey is the one who should get props for truly knocking down and hurting a prime Oscar.
     
  10. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Why would people even be commenting on who won a fight if all they've seen is highlights? More people than not think DLH lost becuase more people than not saw the fight and thought DLH lost.
     
  11. jaco

    jaco Thomas Hearns Full Member

    2,000
    1
    Sep 16, 2007
    I personally had it 114-113 Whitaker ( 6-5-1 Whitaker), a very close fight that could be argued either way. If not for that awful point deduction for an accidental headbutt you could make an even better case for Whitaker winning.
     
  12. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    I've seen the whole fight, Oscar did land the harder shots, but he's a naturally bigger, stronger, and harder hitting fighter. Pea wasn't just slapping him either, he was throwing power shots. And ODLH never hurt Pea in the fight so you can't say he won because he hit harder. The KD isn't impressive, but it's still a KD and the fact that it was a wide UD for ODLH even with the KD shows there was corruption involved, or favortism to a younger star fighter over a fading, past his best fighter. It was close, but like I said, Pea threw more, landed more, landed at a higher connect percentage, and scored the only official KD. Even if you thought he lost, you have to admit it was close, and if a faded Whitaker can keep it close and arguably beat a prime ODLH when he's 33 or 34 where as RJJ can't last with Tarver or Johnson when he's 34 or 35, who has the edge there.

    Another thing about Whitaker is that it's easy to say a guy who is a master at hitting and not getting hit, like him or RJJ or PBF, aren't real fighters like guys such as Julio Cesar Chavez, or Roberto Duran, or Marvin Hagler, but watch Sweet Pea fight Felix Trinidad. Whitaker already had documented drug problems by then, had shown obvious signs of fading in his last 4-5 or even 6 fights, was coming off a year of inactivity due to the drug problems, and was fighting a guy who looks twice his size who just so happens to be a legitimate ATG and one of the most brutal punchers in the history of the 147lbs division, yet Whitaker was the aggressor throughout the first half of the fight and moments of the latter half, stepping forward and backing "Tito" up. That's a fighter, a real fighter. Despite all of his skill and craft and elusiveness, he was a real fighter. Neither RJJ or PBF can claim as much.
     
  13. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Agreed. My exact card too.
     
  14. joekirkbycobra

    joekirkbycobra King Of The Ring Full Member

    3,966
    2
    Jan 4, 2008
    rjj on same level as pea 4 me
     
  15. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    azumah nelson and chavez spring to mind right away...and kiosi galaxy {spelling}...but i could be going over the 20 years ago period...