Aggression and hard punching is by far the most important part of scoring

Yeah sure, if you want to ruin the sport...

 

Then discount Amir Khan and Joe Calzaghe's entire fight career. Take back the awards, belts, money and record because they were not "AGGRESSIVE, HARD PIUNCHERS".
A few other names go there too.

Wladamir Klitschko was not aggressive for the past 10 years or ever in that matter. Take those accolades ,because winning said so .

Viktor Postol gone, Paul Malinaggi gone, Tim Bradley gone, Erislandy Lara gone, Rigondeaux gone, Frampton gone, .....

 

You have no idea what you're talking about.

 

atsch

 

So there's only two options? All you did was throw two extremes at me.. You either like hard punching, however that's measured, and aggression, or you want to see barely no punching..

Just because you find something boring, doesn't mean it is and it needs to go.. I find soccer/futball boring..

If you think two guys walling up to each other trying to knock each other out with every punch, because that's what's more important, will make the sport better, then you don't know what quality boxing is..

 

What if the aggressor was missing because the other guy was moving? Does he still win the round?

You can't make a sport with everyone having the same style.. If you're not going to reward defence, ring generalship, or anything else, you're eliminating styles which would make the sport worse like I said in my first post...

 

You are trolling or re****ed.

 

So boxing should remain the exact same then? Cool...