agree or disagree Audley is a worse fighter then enzo mac the night haye twatted him?

oh right thanks mate. i didnt realise after reading thread upon thread for the past few weeks. cheers pal

 

give fraudley credit i suspect he might last longer than round 2 but not much further

 

Terrible thread and highly disrespectful sad guys :-(

 

You still fighting Dec 11, Tony?

 

How dare you.

 

jerome **** off

 

It's a valid question...

 

The jist of the question may be valid, the wording could do with a bit of work though...

 

You missed NO after IRON in your moniker!

 

I don't see how it is direspectful, quite valid

I see a similar 'fight' and maybe an even quicker ending.

 

Well, Enzo was a world champ at the time, and the odds were a lot closer, so yes i think he was considered better than harrison is now

 

Enzo might have been a better fighter relative to the division they were operating in but he didnt have the significant size advantage or the technical ability that Harrison posesses. Audley's shortcomings have been a lack of balls and questionable mentality. It's never too late to finally focus and lay it all on the line in what is the fight he's waited 20 years for..... If Harrison does this then for me he is a live underdog who will give Haye a much harder fight than the one-sided beatdown many expect.

 

Problem is that in order to win Harrison, at age 39, has got to show mental, physical and technical qualities that he's never shown before. To say its a big ask is an understatement.

 

I think Fraudley will prove a tougher opponent than glass-jawed journeyman Maccarinelli was. It was a joke that molly-coddled Enzo was ever involved in a proper title fight.
I've actually backed Fraudley at 6/1 here.