AJ beats Wilder when he's 41

Considering it's Fury and Wilder who have been reported to turn down multiple fight offers against AJ. It appears Fury and Wilder are the ones that are waiting to "cash out" against AJ if they finally agree to fight AJ.

 

Weren't most Fury fans on here claiming Wallin would beat AJ and was a legit top 10 boxer?

 

Still won so does it really matter?

 

Yes that's another hilarious one. Those idiots really had egg on their face and they're still trying to wipe it off while claiming it's just Fury jizz.

That bloke I'm arguing with still thinks Wilder would beat him. There's no helping some people.

 

To summarise your reasoning Kiwi:

1. Yes, N'Gannou pushed Fury really close and arguably beat him despite everyone expecting him to be easily beaten, but this didn't enhance his standing since it's only the W or L that matters.

2. Yes, AJ best Ruiz in the rematch, but the win wasn't dominating enough to redeem him since its's not only the W or L that matters.

 

If I had to choose between fury and aj having my back I’d choose aj. Fury probably won’t show up and if he did he would be fat and useless. Or I could be completely wrong and fury shows up vs Usyk and looks great and I have to reconfigure this whole post. To be honest I’m still unsure whether fury is really good or not.

 

joshua is a bum with 3 losses

 

3. Aj has three losses which makes him forever crap, but Parker has three losses but is a top fighter on the comeback trail.

 

It's not semantics. You're just missing the point.

 

Not sure where you got that from. But if you want to make comparisons Parker is actually fighting top opposition, AJ isn't.

 

Also lost. So he's drawn at best.

 

Mmmm now compare their last three opponents.

 

I wouldn't pick either of them. I'd be calling Usyk.

 

I’d call Tua

 

I know but he still has three losses. That's what matters right?