No, I even summarised it for you: 1. Yes, N'Gannou pushed Fury really close and arguably beat him despite everyone expecting him to be easily beaten, but this didn't enhance his standing since it's only the W or L that matters. 2. Yes, AJ beat Ruiz in the rematch, but the win wasn't dominating enough to redeem him since its's not only the W or L that matters.
1. Fury beat Ngannou. End of. 2. AJ didn't properly avenge his loss. He could learn a thing of two from Lewis. You can disagree, that's fine, but it's my position on the matter.
Lewis avenged his loss by knocking Rahman out, not running behind his jab. Context matters. Don't be a tool.
I know. I summarised it for you. The performance matters when it suits you, or only the W or L when it suits you. Just as you write above.
Lennox and Rahman are 1-1 as well you silly sausage. You can't keep anything straight in that sausage brain of yours can you? No wonder everyone's picking you apart like a soggy biscuit. Wot you even arguing about now? Oh yeh, bla bla Joshua sucks, Fury is awesome, Parker is awesome even though he lost to Joshua and has three losses, Joshua is ducking Wilder even though Wilder sucks, Lennox beat Rahman and it doesn't matter he lost, Fury went life and death with a zero and 0 wrestler but a win is a win, Joshua beat Ruiz in the rematch but it doesn't count coz he didn't do it in the approved way, blablabla. Eff me you're all over the place like a bad rash. An absolute banana is something you should strive to be because right now you don't even qualify for being an overripe kiwi.