AJ Serving a silent ban (apparently)

Clearly not

 

I don't think you know what libel is, to be frank. There are tonnes of messages on here that are defamatory. Multinational organisations and associations, and extremely wealthy people, aren't going to bother pursuing some random on a very obscure internet forum, so not sure what you are trying to infer by "clearly". There are defamatory messages all over sports internet forums and on social media platforms like X, but only those with public outreach will typically be sued.

 

Don't worry about it, the internet police will be knocking on doors soon locking people up!!

 

I remember the days when couldn’t even type the word ‘Warren’!

 

I agree with one of the earlier posters. Got a good pasting and BBBoC can extend the mandatory 28 day stoppage timeline if need be.

 

The idea that one of the most popular fighters in the sport could fail a drug test and it not be leaked is utterly ridiculous

 

20 , I only know of 18, you've beat me on this one.

In my experience positive tests only matter when it serves a purpose or is in someone's interest.

 

Although the guy in the first post is in fantasy land and likes making up stories, this post is bizarre. Cover-ups in all walks of life are more likely to pertain to and be actioned by powerful people or organisations. The fact that you are using the opposite logic is pretty stupid.

 

Isn’t that what happened with Fury prior to the Klitschko fight?

 

I do know

It's for mods to decide what might affect the website

 

You'd be surprised !

 

The BBC can do nothing in another country hosting a fight.