AJ v Klitschko 2....

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by tdf1974, Feb 1, 2019.


  1. Hattonmad

    Hattonmad Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,647
    4,841
    Jan 5, 2009
    Cunningham was granted an eliminator v Fury because his eliminator v Adamek was so hotly disputed. There was nothing between Adamek and Cunningham in 2012 although both were past their best. Here, in 2019, one of them is rightly retired, and the ghost of the other is being fed to Jarrel Miller. The fact you're belittling the 2012 version of one, and bigging up the 2019 version of the other, shows just how crazy you are. You will go to any length to try justify the impossible and it's oh so sad.

    Whether Cunningham was a justified eliminator or not doesn't matter, because Fury fought and won a second eliminator v Chisora.

    Derek Chisora is a professional 12 years and 35 years old. Jarrel Miller is a professional 10 years and 30 years old. Miller should be in his prime while Derek past his best. Without bothering to go through the huge gaps in the resume of both, we'll just look at their last two fights. Miller beat the ghost of 42 year old Adamek, and Dinu, another tomato can win. Chisora knocked out top ten opponent Carlos Takam, and was up on the scorecards against the widely regarded fourth best heavyweight in the world, before getting stopped in the 11th rounds. Those fights are incomparable!

    Chisora>Miller until proven otherwise. I don't believe AJ is the man he'll prove that against.

    I hope for your sake you're trolling Tony, because if you're really harbouring this much hate and stupidity, I fear for your existence outside the faceless account of 'Tony Hayers'.