AJ vs USYK + Undercards - A huge night for boxing and Anti-Corruption

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Vegan Beast, Sep 29, 2021.


  1. Vegan Beast

    Vegan Beast Grandpappy Ortiz Full Member

    4,070
    4,311
    Aug 19, 2020
    Hear me out first! -

    A lot of people feared Usyk would get robbed, but he got the decision, despite one judge clearly being biased for AJ. But at least 2/3 judges IN THE UK had scorecards that reflected reality and appreciated boxing. (116/117-112 is fair)

    AND -There's even been calls for Howard Foster to EXPLAIN his 115-113 score card by many people.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/16261606/joshua-usyk-judge-bisping-criticism/

    ----------------------------------

    Also even though Martinez was robbed, at least everyone has recognised this and there's been public outrage to the degree that some bookies are refunding bets and everyone recognises it as a robbery.

    Look at the comment sections and ratings on these videos. Literally no body is accepting Hatton as the winner.

    This content is protected


    ---------------------

    Also Maxim Prodan got obliterated by Marku, but one judge scored it 99-91 in his favour, and there was booing from the crowd when I was there. The stadium wasn't very full at the time, but I heard disgust from the crowd.
     
  2. MeatFeastMan

    MeatFeastMan Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,549
    2,341
    Jan 4, 2018
    Howard Foster needs to get his eyes checked. Though to be fair, he was probably looking the other way for most of the fight.

    You cannot give more than 4 rounds to Joshua. Most had it 9-3, with Joshua winning 5,6 and 8 which is also what I had.