AJ's resume till now better than of the Greats of the Past when they had around 20 fights?

"as big as ali and tyson were they werent as sought after as such.tyson chose to fight tons of fights weeks apart but chose to fight 15 or so more bums than aj b4 he stepped it up.im not takin anything away from ali or tyson,theyre both favourites of mine"

Then what are you doing?

 

No, Joshua has not fought any good fighters yet..................

 

What is it with some people who describe people who disagree with them about the abilities of their favourite fighter as haters?
What a strong word. I like Joshua, being a Brit I want him to go all the way and be the best, but a few on here already have him as the second coming.
One has him as a combination of the speed of Ali, the inside game of Frazier and bigger power than Foreman!
Let's wait to see what he actually achieves along the way, especially when he's been drawn into some dog fights.

 

Surprisingly not all too far off from being true for HW's because many of the greats finished their careers with 70 fights and naturally took longer on the way up to fight notable opponents. However Jeffries, Corbett, and Joe Frazier say, "hey, wassup, we're 'greats of the past' who had better resumes in their first 18 bouts than AJ does."

 

Honestly, 18 fights in, he has a better resume than a lot of top 30 HW's all time. Doesn't mean anything, but he does. AJ hater here.

 

Saying that joshua doesnt deserve flack for his level of opposition or where he is at after so few fights.or to put it even more simply,answering the question that the op asked.

 

What? Lmao...

 

Zzzzzzzz