Have heard it was a tough/ very close fight with Minter being considered very lucky to get the decision. Just saw it on youtube and am rather baffled by that view as I had Minter wining fairly clearly in a grueling fight. Any ideas why its considered slightly contraversial?
it wasn't even close. the british judge gave it 15-0 to minter and i think that was the only controversy.
:rofl 15-0 is nuts! That was a hard fight. I didn't score it, just sat down and enjoyed it, but I felt Minter was the harder and cleaner puncher of the two, whilst Vito sort of smothered his work at times.
As a mater of interest-what are peoples scores on the fight? Didn't score it myself but I felt Minter had it in the bag by about 3-4 rounds. Not a bad match actually.
i was having an argument with my then girl friend, so missed it.:twisted: he didn't make any mistakes in the return though:good
Chuck Minker 144-141 for Minter Roland Dakin 149-137 for Minter Ladislao Sanchez 143-145 for Antuofermo [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1AG4xD6It8[/ame] 0:35
Apparently, bizzarely enough, Hunter S Thompson was terrified of Minter and believed he was being stalked by him!:rofl I think he hid under a table when Minter walked into the same room.
i thought it was a very close fight with Minter just taking it by a point or 2 but i thought he definitly got it as his rounds were alot clearer.
I havent seen it since it happened. But I seemed to remember. I actually though Antuofermo won. Would love to see it again soon.
Roland Dakin was closest to the truth. Something like 12-3 or 13-2 for Minter is right. I have seen the tape several times. In their second fight Minter made it even easier. I am not a great Minter fan, but Antuofermo was tailormade for him. Woller