Alex Ariza on JMM's conditioning

so why did you bring up Bolt? atsch

 

A question was asked:

Would someone who would go to the extent of eating shiet and drinking pee just to get a perceived edge (real or imagined), hesitate taking power pellets from Planet Krypton if Superman offered him some? :hey:think

 

I believe he's clean and simply trying to throw a mind **** to team Pac and they are falling for it again.

But quality post, almost makes me want to reconsider my though train regarding this situation

 

I think doping in sport is FAR more common than people are aware, and I believe that A LOT of elite level athletes use performance enhancing drugs of one sort or another, for one reason or another.

As you bought up Usain Bolt, here is Because Angel Heredia, the strength and conditioning coach, who by your own admission was hired by Marquez for his expertise in maximising the capabilities of the human body, who has worked with the highest level of Olympic athletes and knows EXACTLY what they're capable of both on and off drugs, is absolutely convinced that he isn't clean.

http://www.uk-muscle.co.uk/steroid-testosterone-information/172626-performance-enhancing-drugs-professional-sports-long-interview.html

From the horse's mouth:

SPIEGEL: Mr. Heredia, will you watch the 100 meter final in Beijing?

Heredia: Of course. But the winner will not be clean. Not even any of the contestants will be clean.

SPIEGEL: Of eight runners ...

Heredia: ... eight will be doped.

SPIEGEL: There is no way to prove that.

Heredia: There is no doubt about it. The difference between 10.0 and 9.7 seconds is the drugs.

SPIEGEL: Can drugs make anyone into a world record holder?


Heredia: No, that is a misapprehension: “You take a couple of tablets today and tomorrow you can really fly.” In reality you have to train inconceivably hard, be very talented and have a perfect team of trainers and support staff. And then it is the best drugs that make the difference. It is all a great composition, a symphony. Everything is linked together, do you understand? And drugs have a long-term effect: they ensure that you can recover, that you avoid the catabolic phases. Volleyball on the beach might be healthy, but peak athletics is not healthy. You destroy your body. Marion Jones, for example ...

 

well Ariza isn't exactly going to say, "he's on the juice, i should know"

 

one ped expert praising another...


and Lmao at Mrhoetat you tell him a million times random drug testing can be beat but like the uneducated, unemployed turd that he is he keeps repeating the same **** over and over again "buh buh buh tek de tess"

 

Hey, let's be honest. You know Ariza isn't trying to call someone out to bring unnecessary attention onto himself. They both know each other in the underworld, they're gonna back each other up. One falls, the rest do as well. Domino effect. They probably run a lab together somewhere in the mountains of mexico.

 

why is smoking Joe so reluctant to accept PED use in professional sports? it doesn't affect him whether or not peds are being used, athletes are competitors they look for every advantage they can get and if it means to inject testosterones up their butts to run a millisecond faster than they can they'll do it and I or no one else should have a problem with that.

 

well no **** but then why are you on a crusade to clear Marquez's name even using another suspected PED dealers word for it?

the question is y u mad 4?

 

That's the question - is it or isn't it. If all the top athletes are doping, then it's a level playing field between them. But it's not a level playing field for those who are good enough to be at the very top, but don't want to take drugs and therefore lose out because others are doping. Then it's not a level playing field.

This was the case with cycling - the majority of the peleton was doping, and those who chose not to just could not compete with those who were, and those who spoke out against it were forced out the sport by the rest of the cyclists.

Well, that's the kind of thing done by immature little fanboys are better off on your ignore list.

Well, undetectable PEDs are redundant in boxing because you can take what you want.

But in other sports, where there is actual drug testing it's the same problem mentioned above. It's a level playing field as long as you can afford the undetectable stuff - if you can't then you either don't compete or you fail a test.

You see it all the time - the very top names in sport aren't going to throw up a positive test at the Olympics in this day and age. But some poor hammer thrower from Transylvania who can't afford the top advice or substances gets busted taking a basic dose of testosterone trying to level the playing field a bit, is treated as a sacrificial lamb and as proof that anti-doping is working.

The truth is anti-doping is always going to be trying to play catch up with the cheats. But they're fighting losing battle, because all the money is in developing the science behind the best drugs to give you an edge over your rivals, not developing the science behind catching drugs cheats.

 

Like they did to Pac....like they are now doing to Floyd? Crazy. Without evidence I don't give any rumor or accusation seriously.

 

What evidence would you be looking for, in this case for example?