So I defended the living **** out of Devon Alexander last night/this morning and I maintain that from my initial viewing, he won a decision. However, I'm not so ****ing arrogant to think that if 80% of the forum ferverently believes Kotelnik won and won easily I'm right and they're wrong. I'm gonna have to go back and score it (SOBER this time) and possibly reconsider my scoring criteria. Apologies for starting a thread all about me and my ****:tong
117-111 Alexander. Hard to score rounds for Kotelnik getting outjabbed and covering up 85% of the rounds.
well, from what i saw last night alexander was outlanding him but his punches didn't do much. now, from what i've read he was hitting gloves all night which would obviously change the scoring. it'll be interesting on second viewing
round 2 to Kotelnik who landed several jabs, a few right hands up the middle and a big left hook. Alexander landed a few straight lefts but mostly hit the guard.
its funny cause Compubox shows Kotelnik landed 15 jabs to Alexander's 4 in round 2, and then Harold Lederman says he gave it to Alexander cause "Its amazing how many right jabs he lands"
hate to break it to you... if it was 50 to 190, then than means 190 out of 240 people think Kotelnik won... and that is precisely 79.2%...
see that round i thought compubox ****s up and they reversed the stats:nut i saw alexander landing WAY more than 4
I caught the replay last night. I watched the fight, although missed first two rounds. I can say I don't know what the hell everyone's talking about. It was a close fight depending on what you liked, business or one punch at a time but great shots. Personally I might have voted for Alexander if I were a judge that night. Kotelnik just needed to do more.
no man, Alexander hit almost nothing but the guard or air From what you just said you can stop scoring now cause its already obvious you're trying to give the fight to Alexander "I thought compubox reversed the stats" atsch