Alexander Povetkin’s New Sample Clear – Ryabinsky to sue Team Wilder

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Farmboxer, Jun 2, 2016.


  1. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    They have no case at all against Wilder. He doesn't have to wait on Povetkin to have a clean sample after the samples during the training camp came up dirty. Povetkin f#cked up...now he has to get back in line.

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
     
  2. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Thing is, it wouldn't surprise me if the WBC decided his place was back in the front of the line. We'll see.
     
  3. mostobviousalt

    mostobviousalt Active Member banned Full Member

    519
    103
    Jun 4, 2016
    Fat soluble. Just like THC. You can positive negative for THC, do a hard workout and test positive afterwards.
     
  4. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    The case with wilder is about defamation and the stuff wilder and he's team has said since which they have a good case for. Id like too see some you tubers like dontaes boxing nation get taken to court over this
     
  5. Gollywog

    Gollywog Member Full Member

    108
    3
    Jun 13, 2013
    It hasn't been research because it hasn't. The majority of trials have been done on mice, and not humans. The rest of your paragraph doesn't even make sense in this context. You call it a harmless supplement though - could you link me to the research you performed to arrive at that conclusion? Can you show me your studies that show it doesn't cause cancer or birth defects? Remind me at which prestigious university you studied medicine? The point is nobody knows for sure, so don't go making wild claims you can't back up.

    And no it isn't something WADA is supposed to do before banning a drug. Again, quite the opposite. Their rules specifically say that can ban a drug for whatever reason they choose, or for no reason at all. It's there in black and white in their guidelines.
     
  6. Gollywog

    Gollywog Member Full Member

    108
    3
    Jun 13, 2013
    He's not interested in listening to reasoned responses like this. If it doesn't match his opinion, it'll go in one ear and out the other.
     
  7. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    They cant ban a drug give a months notice when they have no idea of excretion times, that it just plain stupid or corrupt
     
  8. Gollywog

    Gollywog Member Full Member

    108
    3
    Jun 13, 2013
    They can't? Seems like they did. So actually, they can. They make the rules, not you or me. They also made it very clear that they don't have enough research under their belts, hence the leeway, and the fact that Povetkin will probably be given the all clear.
     
  9. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    The have no case. That's not slander at all. He didn't say anything like he saw Povetkin using PED's and I have proof. Wilder didn't ruin Pov's reputation, Foh.:lol:

    You can say anything you want about anyone as long as you don't attempt to say that you have proof of this on that person. And his comments were made AFTER the positive test. Sue Wilder for what.
     
  10. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    A month's notice? Are you serious???:lol:
     
  11. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,381
    26,635
    Jun 26, 2009
    The Russian promoter is the one who admitted he tested positive. Is he going to sue himself?
     
  12. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    There's a difference between saying someone tested positive and someone failed a test
     
  13. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    That isn't enough to sue someone for slander.
     
  14. XCalibur79

    XCalibur79 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,672
    4
    May 13, 2015
    How can he sue Wilder at this point? This makes no sense. If Povetkin is allegedly clean now and the first test was bogus, why sue Wilder when the WBC called off the fight? Why not just try to get the fight rescheduled and reclaim his mandatory status? If he could do that then the WBC could strip Wilder if he doesn't fight. Suing him now doesn't make any sense at all. Seems like if they would sue anyone its the WBC.

    Absolutely bizarre.
     
  15. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,147
    39,636
    Sep 29, 2012
    ..