Alexander Povetkin vs. Christian Hammer RBR

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Dec 15, 2017.


  1. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    Hey, CST isn't goddamn old!!! :mad:
     
    UnleashtheFURY likes this.
  2. SnatchBox

    SnatchBox Boxing Full Member

    5,426
    4,686
    Nov 26, 2016
    Wilder vs Povetkin would have been so much fun
     
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,536
    15,989
    Jul 19, 2004
    Fair enough.

    Our main point of disagreement, I think, is that I think 6 title defenses is an accomplishment in its own right. His opposition hasn't been terrific, for sure. But that's not entirely his fault either (you can't blame Wilder for the fact that fights with Povetkin and Ortiz never materialized after they were signed). But the reality is, there aren't very many heavyweight champions who have had more successful defenses than Wilder.

    And to me, the fact that Povetkin never won a major title does make him less accomplished than Wilder. Circumstances played a role, no doubt, and of course always play a role. But that's the way the cookie crumbled.

    At the end of the day - Wilder is a reigning heavyweight world champion with 6 consecutive title defenses to his credit. And Povetkin is a long time contender who never won any of the 4 major championship belts.
     
    DONT B SCARED and lewis gassed like this.
  4. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,132
    39,611
    Sep 29, 2012
    "Huck? Is this a joke? Or are you using his achievements at cruiser to justify the fact that Povetkin struggled badly with him? Look. If you want to say you believe all those guys are better than Stiverne (minus Huck), I don't have a major issue with that. I think Stiverne is at least better than a few of those guys, if not more accomplished."

    I consider the elite CW's of the past 10 years to be as good or better than a lot of top 15 HW's. Huck I consider to be a better fighter than Stiverne overall. His losing effort against Povetkin to me is more impressive than anything Stiverne has shown throughout his career.

    ". But this isn't his fault, is it? When champions retire, two guys usually fight for the vacant strap. Stiverne was the one who got the crack, and at the time, most people felt Arreola would beat him as I recall. "

    No. But the point was to illustrate that when you take away belts and just analyze the wins themselves that Povetkin has accomplished more overall and roughly as much since those guys(Parker-Wilder won their belts). On that matter I think the WBC handled the vacuum Vitali left pretty poorly - the contenders tournament they had sucked and the eliminator between Wilder/Scott to determine the 1st mandatory was also pretty farcical. How could Scott who was coming off a stoppage loss to Chisora be fit for such an opportunity? Viewed in a vacuum I don't see how you can possibly argue that beating Arreola X2 to win a vacant title, or Stiverne is better than Chagaev even if for a lesser regarded belt - Some of the prestige for the WBC title evaporated and has yet to return as far as I'm concerned when Vitali retired and dropped the belt. Belts are only as good as the guys who fight for them.... It's a slippery slope rating ABC's just for the sake of it and not the reigns themselves.

    We'll have to agree to disagree - but your arguments for the most part are hard to completely argue against. Part of how I rate Povetkin(as IB put it) is based on the hypothetical that he was extremely unlucky to come along during the Klitschko era, and then the fact that he's remained consistent since.

    I'll leave it at that.. You can get the last word.
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  5. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    8,876
    Oct 8, 2013
    Yes I've seen a few of your posts and you have been consistent you're not high on Povetkin at all. To be honest took me long time to warm up to him. I remember following him when he started out and he took some quality matches early in his career then Atlas got a hold of him and he seemed to regress In both skill and quality of opponent. He was really headed towards a wasted career. Then he got rid of Teddy and to me seemed to begin to fulfill his potential again.
    He does two things Imo really well, he throws good combinations for a heavyweight which is a rarity for the division for many years now, and he is a very accurate puncher. That's in terms of skills what i also like but has been lacking lately is he has a strong will to win and killer insticnt. I was impressed how he hung in there with Wlad when he had no gameplan and was hurt early and hurt badly several times.
    Now looking back on his career he really has some quality wins and he's been really consistent.
    He's been a top 10 hw for long time. Talent wise he's no Golota or even a Tommy Morrison. But he comes to win and he comes to grind you down. Consider me a converted fan of his. And i firmly believe with his timing he would of Ko'd Wilder easy had they fought. At this point I'm not sure anymore.
     
    kostya by ko and Rumsfeld like this.
  6. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    47,982
    36,738
    Apr 17, 2011
    :D i missed it. I hope you can forgive me.
    (P.S. I had THE worst shift i have had in the last 6 months. Working at a bar has its serious bad days. I bet i had a worse showing than Povetkin)
     
  7. lordlosh

    lordlosh Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,759
    7,483
    Jun 4, 2014
    Stiverne is a joke and would not be even top 10 best opponent Povetkin has met.
    Stiverne just suc**.
    Povetkin 13 fight was against Larry Donald.
    Povetkin 14 fight, was against 2 time champion Byrd, who only loses was to Wlad Klitschko and Ibeabuchi.
    Povetkin 15 fight, was against prime Chambers(better then anyone at Wilder resume by huge margin) and he was 30-0, when met Povetkin.
    Then you have names like Chagaev, Cedric Boswell, Huck, Rahman, undefeated Wawrzyk, Klitschko, Charr, Takam, Perez, Wach, destroyed Duhaupas, unlike Wilder, who struggle at times with him, Rudenko and now Hammer.
    Most of Povetkin wins was over a prime guys with zero or just 1 lose, unlike Wilder Buffet Bums ....
    Povetkin resume is 10 time better then Wilder.
    And even now past prime Povetkin will Ko Wilder if they met in 1 year period. But Wilder will run as always ...
     
    mirkofilipovic likes this.
  8. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    And that sort of thinking empowers the pathetic sport-hindering actions of the 4 trinket title belts.

    Why would you not value your own opinion, Rum? Puzzling to say the least.
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,536
    15,989
    Jul 19, 2004
    Well, there is my opinion, and then there is the idea of 'accomplishments' in boxing. Note I never said I necessarily thought Wilder would beat Povetkin. I think it's a 50-50 proposition, and I can see strong cases being made both ways.

    But in terms of accomplishments, is there any objective way to say that Povetkin is more accomplished? I suppose you can say that him being ranked longer, or him having more victories over top 10 opponents, or head-to-head hypotheticals - you could make the case. I'm no fan of the 4 major sanctioning bodies. But that is the standard of measurement we use, and have been using for decades.

    Title defenses is one of the few fairly objective measurements we can use when comparing boxers of the last 40 years or so. And every boxer strives to become a champion. So for me personally, in my opinion, I struggle to see how one boxer who never won a major championship can be considered more accomplished than one who did, and strung together half a dozen title defenses.

    At the end of the day, I think Andrew Golota was far more skilled and talented than John Ruiz. But I think, regardless of that opinion, you have to consider Ruiz the more accomplished of the 2. When you look at the complete packages of Wilder and Povetkin, I'm not really sure who the better boxer is. But I undoubtedly believe that Wilder has to clearly be considered the more accomplished of the 2.
     
  10. kostya by ko

    kostya by ko Boxing Addict

    5,569
    4,360
    Feb 18, 2005
    It will be interesting to see how Wilder plays out over time. If he were to lose his zero and WBC belt - especially if he's beaten convincingly, will he be back challenging again, regaining his WBC belt or taking hold of another one? With Hrgović, Usyk, Dycho, etc coming up soon, probably not. But then again, we won't know until it happens.

    I've followed Povetkin since before he went pro, so I admit I'm kind of a fan. But I think had he had the same route to a belt that Wilder had, he would have won himself a WBC belt as well, and if he fought the same opposition he'd probably be undefeated too. And I really can't see Wilder beating the Wlad that beat Povetkin.

    This is all why, as a boxing fan most interested in the HW/Cruiser divisions I just want to see Wilder fight Joshua/Ortiz/Parker, or even Povetkin in 2018/19. No predictions, I'm just fascinated to see the fights and how he does.

    Personally, I think if Wilder is knocked out in his first fight against top tier opposition, and never does much of note afterwards, Povetkin would go down in my book as being more accomplished due to the quality of names on his CV.
     
  11. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,694
    80,963
    Aug 21, 2012
    Wilder would have left smoking rubber on the tarmac if he'd had to face Wlad. I give him a small chance of seeing the end bell and virtually no chance of winning.
     
    Rumsfeld and kostya by ko like this.
  12. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,075
    6,786
    Jan 13, 2017
    Not sure I share a some posters opinion on Povetkin. His punch power is way overated too, always has been imo. Had far to much trouble with a strong Cruiserweight to ever be a top boy at Heavy imo, and its showed, he never seems to fight top guys consistently.
     
  13. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,536
    15,989
    Jul 19, 2004
    No major arguments from me, barring the fact I would definitely give Wilder a chance. A slim one, but better than virtually no chance.
     
    madballster and BCS8 like this.
  14. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Even an old Vlad would beat Wilder, probably knock him out, he sure beat the crap out of him in camp! Knocked him down with a left jab, flattened him with a left hook, beat him from one side of the ring to the other, and yes, there is a witness....................Vitali could come back at age 46 and knock Wilder out, he is WBC Emeritus Champion............he could force Wilder to fight him and yes, he would have to force Wilder to fight him.................When will Wilder fight a legit fighter?
     
  15. Beyonce Wilder

    Beyonce Wilder Active Member Full Member

    918
    779
    Nov 11, 2015
    haha true but wilder would take this fight comfortably knowing vitali would somehow be popped on the drug test (like how he tested positive all those years back).