I just think that Huck was better at what he did than Baer. Quicker, more explosive, more focussed, better defence, better offence. Baer might have had better punch resistance, it's hard to say, and might have possessed a tad more power due to his longer wingspan, but he was far too deficient in other areas for that to make enough of a difference.
I don't need to mention a win over Huck to embellish Povetkin, and quote where I wrote that you imbecile or STFU.
so you deny that you were selling Huck as a boost for Povetkin beating Baer? ok. You are on ignore, there is no point wasting time with a fool who denys what he wrote right at the top of the same page.