alexander povetkin vs tyson fury who wins and why ??

Don't think Povetkin's big enough to handle Fury, and I don't think he's quick enough to get past the jab either. Tyson UD.

 

Povetkin is hilariously overrated. Fury blasts him out without much bother

 

Tyson Fury, and he could make it look easy.

Too much size advantage, Povetkin is short and has showed he doesn't have the skills to get inside a tall superheavy.

Against Wlad he was clueless and helpless.

Fury does not hit as hard as Wlad, but is even bigger, heavyer and could fight with different styles.

 

Povetkin struggeld with Wladimirs holding and din't let go in clinches. However he probably learned from that fight and has improved since. Tyson don't stand much of a chance against the Olympic gold medalist from Russia.

The argument that the fight with Wladimir has any baring against Povetkin is jsut stupid. Wladimir is one of the greatest heavyweights of all time, Tyson fury isn't. He doesn't have anywhere near the same punching power, athleticism, jab, right hand, left hook, stamina, chin, footwork etc.

 

Povetkin by late ko

 

LOL.

CW Marco Huck stood toe to toe with Povetkin and beat him senseless.
But this 'Greatest HW EVER' shat his pants every time Povetkin got close and held on like his life was at risk.

Go and compare the size , power and strength difference of Wlad to Huck and you might begin to realize the stupidly of what you just posted.

 

And he missed half of them against Tackam.

 

You forgot to put the D in your username brah.

 

Touche , but Povetkin was losing badly before Tackam gassed out.

http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=186029&start=25

Fury has a great engine sustainable for 12 rounds and is better and faster on his feet than Tackam

 

Povetkin might struggle a little with Furys size but is a better fighter in every respect. Even if he failed to put Fury to sleep (which is pretty likely) he would win every round.

Furys only chance would be a Wladesque smother and clinch game, but he doesn't have Wlads timing or the power to win the intervals between clinches.

Povetkin - wide UD or late KO.

 

Well if you acually read what I wrote you would understand that I said one of the, not the but I'll let that one slip for now.

Do you agree that styles make fights? Wouldn't wanna call loosing a 12 round decision beating someone senseless but ok we probably got different ideas of senseless. I for instance belive you are abit senseless but it's just my opinion, no need to be all sensitive about it.

What does huck have to do with the fury fight I don't get it. The only similarty Fury has with Wladimir is his size but it's not like Fury is in great shape or anything like that he's just fit enough to s****e by european level fighters.

Povetkin is an outstanding fighter who acually has fought alot of good fighters. Fury hasn't really fought anyone of note. I mean lets think about it for a minute, who has Fury fought that's even remotley on Povetkins level? I guess it's no one huh.

 

So why couldn't he win every round vs Tackam?. You're talking fantasy, not reality.

 

Fury knocked Cunningham out cold. USS knocked out Huck.

Who has Povetkin beat? Huck and Wlad were the best guys he fought.

Huck did nothing more than throw wild , swings at Povetkin. After the beating he took in that fight , how is it possible or logical to favour him against Fury who is almost twice the size of Huck, hits harder , is lighter on his feet,has better defence , wider punch selection and a better workrate?

 

Yes, Povetkins short inside hooks would get nowhere on Fury.

He'd be hooked , uppercutted and spone . Rince and repeat till he was no more.

Povetkin is a great HW in this era who beats everybody else out there, but Fury is all wrong for him.

 

[yt]?v=tNVvlq8xfbI[/yt]