Alexander Povetkin vs Tyson Fury - Who wins?

Eddie Chambers says Tyson Fury would beat Povetkin and hes an unbiased pro Heavyweight boxer. Eddie bro these Fury haters are dumb as hell.

 

The problem with Fury is that he has been floored by two Cruiserweights with overhand rights, if and when a big heavyweight like, Wilder or either of the Klitchko brother hit him with that punch I don't see him getting up. Poverty in has more natural power than a Cruiserweight and is fast. The game plan for Fury should be to use his height and reach to outbox Povetkin.

People hate Fury because he is claiming to be a world beater but know matter how you look at it he has got himself to the top of the rankings by hard work and winning fights. I'm not a big fan of his but you can't take away from him what he has achieved, and that's what every boxer dreams of when they first step in the gym, a shot at the heavyweight title.

 

Sorry about the spelling. Auto correct on my iPad keeps changing it.

 

I've always been a fan, but it's clear that Povetkin has gone on an upswing since that fight, while u unfortunately have gone on a downswing

U literally went from world class title contender to fighting on obscure cards against bums in England. Not sure why u went off to train with the Fury's, but its a huge downgrade.

wish u the best though, ur clearly way more talented than Tyson Fury and most other top 10 or top 15 heavyweights, u shouldn't be wasting ur prime fighting the Dorian Darches of the world and preparing inferior boxers for their money fights

 

thats laughable coming from you.

 

unbiased????? he works for fury.

 

Povetkin in a close fight

I like Fury, but I'd put him behind Wlad and Povetkin.

 

He works with team Fury. And if you actually listened to some of his interviews, you would realize Chambers is a smart, down to earth and very informative man.

A shame a lot of top dogs are scared to be embarrassed by him, because he belongs up there, and he's still one of the fastest and most skilled boxer in the world.

Had he fought 40 years ago, he would have embarrassed everyone, his only limitation is his size.

 

You have a strange definition of cracked chin, since Fury has never been stopped :think

 

Povetkin is tough but limited, and has never shown to have the tools to beat a tall boxer.

Against Fury he would be even more schooled than against Waldo; have he learned how to enter a reach, or is he still practicing the bling hedgeog low head rush?

 

Chambers is a decent fighter but recently he has been calling out Anthony Joshua in the UK. Time will tell but I don't think Eddie can handle the size and power of Joshua. His team are looking after him well and if they agreed the fight with Chambers I'd be surprised if he went the distance.
He's just calling out the big name in British boxing to get known in the UK. Makes sense because after losing to Mchuna by 8 rounds to 2 no one is gonna remember you.

 

Big fan of both guys, but Povetkin takes it. Fury has the tools to beat any HW not named Klitshko, or Povetkin. Joshua is unproven at the moment, although he looks very good. so can't pick hi against Fury until certain questions are answered.

 

Chisora-Povetkin would be a good competitive fight.

Fury or Joshua vs Povetkin are both pretty much mismatches. Povetkin might possibly go the distance against Fury and lose a wide decision, Joshua wipes him out in 6

 

No it wouldn't. Povetkin put a clinic on, and then KO him brutally. see the Charr fight for how this one would go. Charr has a very similar style to Chisora.

 

Don't be silly, Charr is levels below Chisora, go compare their respective fights against Vitali and Danny Williams. Povetkin needed a gift to beat blown up caveman Huck but he puts a clinic on Chisora and KOs him? OK