Alexander Povetkin would PASTE both wilder and stiverne

Oh shut up british somal.

Povetkin is very good fighter. These two chumps tonight are merely your secret hopes to bringing the crown for "right" people.:yep

 

atsch

 

whats alex done - managed with great difficulty middling huck and beat ageing byrd.


that is his top best ever form - therefore his self definition is middling. there is no need to lie about him when Alex spells out the truth himself that he is middling.

he obviously had a bit more class as a youngster but hes fraudleed out as a pro.

 

tell me who is has beat.

and then self shut yourself up with your reply.

and for your info I have no interest in these 2 chumps, other than to note that Stiverne seems better - so you failed on that front to.

 

Can you imagine Povetkin in the 90's, don't think he'd be ranked number 2 somehow

 

You think Chisora would beat Povetkin, GTFO Brittard. atsch

 

I don't think he would do as bad as you think. He would be top 5 at any point in the 90s, that's for sure.

 

hes struggled with huck and beat ageing byrd. that it basically the equivalent of struggling with axel Schultz and beating ageing trev berbick or perhaps more accurately Leon Spinks. that would not make him top 5, but he wouldtn be too far off it, knocking on top 10, and perhaps suggests the potential to make top 5 if was able to build his skills further.

he might win the new wbo belt in the 90s, since it was largely unwanted back then.

 

:rofl

 

No chance, what made me say this was I was recently looking at ring magazine rating, here's 1996 for example

1. Evander Holyfield
2. Lennox Lewis
3. Mike Tyson
4. Michael Moorer
5. Andrew Golota
6. Ray Mercer
7. Henry Akinwande
8. David Tua
9. Rid**** Bowe
10. Tim Witherspoon

Povetkin is a very limited, one-dimensional fighter, he'd be a punch bag in the 90's, even fat, old Foreman would wipe the floor with him.

 

Stiverne KO's punching bag Manuel Charr with ease.

Charr has no skills and no speed at all.

 

I dont understand why a brit would slag off povetkin. A **** might though.

 

charr is barely a boxer, why is he being mentioned at all as a standard for comparison.

 

Arreola is 100 times better than Charr. Ask Vitali Klitschko.

41 y.o. Vitali in his last fight easily dropped Charr in the 2nd round, dominated every round and stopped that overrated punchbag in 4th rd.