Alexander Povetkin would PASTE both wilder and stiverne

Yes.

But he isn't from that part of the globe, so he actually has to earn his shot at the WBC belt.

 

no, charr is rubbish. he bulrushes his opposition in some vain attempt to land a punch as he moves in head down. it is akin to playground fighting.

charr has only become known because the hw titlist was poor enough to pick someone so lowly to defend against and he knew he get away with it against such dumb fans of his.


before that, nothing. after that, nothing.

 

Like he did with Schultz, Savarese, Stewart, and Grimsley??? Lol yeah ok..... Povetkin is more talented than all of those guys combined, and Foreman struggled with each of them. Stewart being a journeyman!

Again, I have Povetkin cracking that list. he'd be at 4-5.

 

Povetkin would also paste Wlad rotten in a fair fight.

 

Not to mention half of those guys would fail any sort of drug test

 

Fck me you have gone full re**** this time :rofl

YDKSAB!!

 

targeting a fighter in his mid-forties with your argument?
At least you are consistent..... Briggs....

 

Perhaps he could fight the winner then we'd find out

 

Regardless of if you believe Povetkin would beat Stiverne or not (I'd make Povetkin a favorite vs. Stiverne), Stiverne would wreck Charr. Charr stylistically will take too many punches and get chopped down.

 

Somal started stuttering?

Brit***s and the somal army seems to forget that Povetkin has had one bad fight against Huck which he actually won.:yep And a loss against ATG heavyweight champion.

Povetkin has beat Chagaev, Byrd, Takam, Donald for name fighters.

He is very good fighter, he has skills, heart and the motivation unlike most of the glass jawed mental midgets on barry white's list.:deal

Povetkin would hold his own rather easily when motivated against guys on that list even the somals know it and that is why they are so butt hurt.

 

at last an answer.

now we've covered byrd, ageing though he was, was not a bad win.

but whats all these at best middlers like chageav, takam, Donald?

flop mate.

qualify the statement, tell me who is really good that hes beat.
don't keep repeating the same failures.

 

^^This Somal only denigrates Povetkin because he lost to Wladimir Klitschko.:yep

Dont be butt hurt somal.:good re****ed and bitter people like you are destroying the Great Britain.

 

Povetkin would be favoured over both but I don't think he would just steam roll over them like he did with Charr.

Stiverne hits hard enough to really hurt Povetkin with a counter a he comes in, but then I could see Povetkin also breaking him down and stopping him late like in the Takam fight.

Wilder's true ability is unknown, he could fold in a round or 2 he could surprise us all tonight and pull off an upset and then he'd have to be taken seriously.

Povetkin is a good fighter but limited, he'd be competitive in most era's, though he'd struggle to win a title in a strong era, he's very solid but can be outboxed and hurt as proven by Wlad and Huck.

 

Almost no doubt that he would be able to knock Wilder out.
As for Stiverne, that's where I doubt. Povetkin has similar style with Arreola and that's why he would take several hard counter-punches from Stiverne, however being able to outbox him. I'd say it would be close UD with Povetkin losing several rounds

 

so no answer to who has he beat that's good, to validate him being good.

at best pov is good enough to beat middlers. that's all hes proved.