Alexander Povetkin's historical significance? Was he big enough?

Wtf....this is like WAR in baseball. Clever but useless.
Lies, damned lies and statistics.

 

based on Pov knocking out.... Manuel.... Charrrr....

 

I've already made my position clear meathead you didnt read it, so I will requote myself to give you the answers you didnt read first time -

but huck more accomplished obviously, as I said, as a pro, with pov much more as an am.

 

Povetkin is much better than fans think he is, he won the gold, super heavyweight divsion!!! However, he is getting old, the other heavyweights are waiting for him to get much older................

 

I'm sorry to say Povetkin is much slower and with less stamina than he once had. If you look back at the Byrd fight, he threw an incredible amount of punches during that one. He may be more tactical and maybe a bit tougher now, but you can't put a price on speed and youth.

 

povs historical significance is that he knocked out ...manuel...charrrrr

 

noones denying he was a stellar amateur like fraudley harrison.

but at pro, his significance is... knocking out....manuel....charrrrrrr

 

The best combination puncher of this HW era, stamina, inside skills, power, chin. These attributes would carry over well to any era.

 

Did all that Egypt stuff get canned? Or am I just becoming old and senile and can't find threads anymore?

 

Povetkin is too big for Wilder! Wilder is very afraid of Povetkin, Haymon will never allow that fight to happen. Povetkin by knockout and Haymon knows it! Waiting for Povetkin to get old, as Wilder will be fighting for 50 years against winos from the alley, perhaps a few old ladies...........