Alexander vs Matthyse: A close fight is not a robbery

I always knew your opinions were worthless and now I and anyone else reading this have absolute proof.

 

Watch the 7th and 8th rounds fool.

 

Just goes to show that he's still on his knee wiping Alexander's cum from his mouth and eyes.

 

Undeniable proof the fix was in. As is usually the case in robberies, there's at least one absurdly lopsided scorecard in favor of the "winner".

 

farmy called it.

they also agree with the ref that gave alexander 7 rounds to 3.

 

thats why it was a robbery

 

why do all these ****** *****s nuthug Devon Alexander? Is it some kind of coincidence that you got Hussleman, Blizz, and Reppin501 defending this ****?

 

Matthyse should have won, he didn't get it. How is that not a robbery.

 

It wasn't close, it was 1 of the worst robberies I've ever seen, Matthyse beat Alexander's ass round on round, no way Alexander won more than 3 rounds and I was a fan of his before this

I'm a ***** so **** off

 

You can have a close fight but if Matthysse CLEARLY won 5 rounds + a knockdown then IMO it's a robbery. I could understand if all the rounds we're close but they weren't Matthysse clearly won rounds 4, 7, 8 and 10 IMO which gives him at least a draw. You can't even debate those rounds.

 

I aint no fan of either, but Matthyse clearly won that fight, no doubt, hometown robbery. You gotta feel for Matthyse.

 

Alexander won 4 rounds at the very best. Add to that Matthysse scored a knockdown and its fair to say that Matthysse deserved the win. Alexander is just not that good. He should have 3 losses on his record.

 

I agree. For example the Macklin-Sturm fight was close and I don't see that as a robbery (and I was rooting for Macklin) however this fight wasn't even close imo Lucas was robbed.

 

That statement would be true of Alexander-Matthysse was a close fight. But unfortunately, it wasn't!