I actually had Witter beating Bradley by a point, but I know Junior so I was biased but he didn't take anything a beating that overhand right KD aside I'd pick Bradley too, but if they mix it up it plays into Alexanders hands
I don't think it'll be exciting enough to be a beat down, hopefull I'm wrong. Who'd you pick between Bradley-Khan, I thought Bradley had allot of problems with Holts height/reach (which is the same as Khans)
bradley, i dont think he had problems with holts height or reach but his power, khan cant fight on the inside and thats where bradley is at his best.
Jesus this **** is still going? Listen even Bob Arum agrees that the winner of Bradley vs Alexander is on the road to Pac-man. Without Khan...get over it.
I'm not one who follows the logic of 'A beat B who beat C, so C loses to A'. Khan completely shut out Kotelnik, yet Alexander barely scrapes by against the same man - getting a gift decision in the process. Does this mean Khan is better than and will beat Alexander? Of course not. The Witter I saw against Alexander, was a dejected and deteriorated Witter. I agree with Relentless. Bradley took Witter's confidence away and softened him up.
Bare in mind Witter's had a rough time. I believe his dad was suffering from cancer when the Bradley fight came along? I think he died after both fights. Some tragedy anyway.
Because Bradley plays the game...this whole Alexander deal boils down to him and his team being "too proud" to just say the "right things", smile, and move on. Bradley (who I give more credit to in this regard) doesn't give a **** about being disrespected, and treated like a second fiddle attraction to anybody because he's simply fighting to support his family. He wants the money, he knows his window is closing by the day and this is a chance he's been waiting on. He's not going to compromise this chance by getting caught up in prideful type ****, like I said I give him credit for that, it comes with maturity. Alexander and his team are on "**** Amir Khan" because they feel they are being disrespected. To act as if they "owe" Amir Khan **** is beyond them, hence the "who the **** is Amir Khan" as in who is he or anyone associated with him, to try and dictate terms to us, make demands of us, or that we somehow have to fight him to be the guy in our division, when we are fighting the #1 right now. Out of principle they aren't going to be bullied by Khan even if it hurts them long term, that's just who they are and what they are about, right, wrong, or indifferent.
Would you not pick Alexander to beat the dog **** out of Prescott? Of course you would, not saying it would 100% happen, but logic tells you it would. If Alexander fought Prescott next, and KO'd him in the 3rd, does that mean he's any better than Khan? Absolutely not, the entire line of logic is flawed.
It just makes no sense for Alexander to state this. Whether he agrees or not, Khan is one of the top guys @ 140 and one of his peers. The winner should fight Khan.