Ali improved as a boxer after FOTC

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, Feb 25, 2008.


  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    After the first fight with Frazier Ali IMO improved on his worst deficiency: the tendency to keep his right hand low while punching with his left, and therefore leaving himself open to an opponent's left hook. In the first part of his career he got away with it due to his fantastic movement, with some exceptions. Chuvalo for example quite frequently landed his left hook in their first meeting while Ali was punching.

    In the first fight against Frazier Ali hadn't remedied this flaw despite not having the same movement anymore, and paid dearly for it. After that fight there was a noticeable improvement, though. Just compare his first fight against Chuvalo with his second, and the FOTC with the subsequent fights against Frazier. In the third fight, where he is even more flat-footed than in the first, it's easy to see that his defense is improved in this sense. He still gets tagged now and then by Fraziers left hook, but only later on and not as frequently.

    Do you agree/disagree?
     
  2. prime

    prime BOX! Writing Champion Full Member

    2,564
    90
    Feb 27, 2006
    "He had a good style", said Terrell about the Ali he fought in '67. Ali had a boxing style all his own, based fundamentally on speed, reflexes, judgment of distance and pinpoint accuracy, all wrapped up in a fluid, rhythmic, athletic package. And he was the whole package by the time he dethroned Liston.

    Of necessity, age gradually deteriorated now this or that quality of Ali's style, but I believe he never adopted fundamental boxing skills to compensate for it. He stuck to different versions of sticking-and-moving and later added the rope-a-dope. I believe he of course knew all about standard boxing skills, but always fought as he wished.

    I think both Chuvalo and Frazier were simply younger and thus more able to connect on Ali the first time around.

    I don't think he was an improved boxer after FOTC.
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    Watch the Thrilla in Manilla again and compare it with FOTC. I think it's clear that he was more mindful of not letting the right hand drop. In many fights after FOTC you can see that he uses a gard when not moving.

    As much as I admire Ali I think he looks very careless against Chuvalo in 1966 for example. If slow Chuvalo can get to him like he does in that fight it makes you wonder what a much more dynamic fighter like Tyson could do.
     
  4. groove

    groove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,056
    26
    May 16, 2006
    Ali was a better fighter by the time of Norton 2 and Frazier 2. reason - his footwork and conditioning was better than in FOTC. His style was based on speed and movement. He changed it for the Foreman fight. But 60s Ali was quicker and had better footwork. His footwork was his defence most of the time. Manila was a slugfest really so he had to keep his hands up more as he was in punching range. 60s Ali stayed just outta punching range and his feet did all the work.
     
  5. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    I'm not disputing that Ali was in his prime in the 60's and also, as you say, faster and in better conidtion in the rematches against Frazier and Norton. That's all true. But it seems to me that it was first after the FOTC that he felt he had to improve his gard to defend primarily against left hooks, since his feet no longer did the job quite as they used to do (even if they still did it very well).

    In the second fight against Quarry it's also evident that he kept his gard high when standing flat-footed before his opponent. I think he adapted quite well in this sense. Up to and including FOTC he had been knocked-down three times by left hooks, but that never happened again.

    He was always vulnerable to a good counter jab, though.
     
  6. Swedish81

    Swedish81 Member Full Member

    366
    4
    Nov 22, 2005
    I get your point. When his athletic ability declined his fundamental boxing ability improved, right?
     
  7. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    In a nutshell, yes. Vi svenskar förstår varandra uppenbarligen.

    So, the most usual complaint against Ali - that his technique was lacking because he didn't have fundamentals - is therefore faulty in my opinion. When he needed the fundamentals he used them. Too bad it took him the brutal fight against Frazier to realize he couldn't afford to be as nonchalant anymore.

    With that said his footwork continued to be amazing until the latter part of the 70's, just not quite as amazing as in the 60's. Primarily he didn't have the stamina to dance for a full fight anymore as he did against Terrell for example.
     
  8. Swedish81

    Swedish81 Member Full Member

    366
    4
    Nov 22, 2005
    Ja, det verkar så. Välkommen till forumet förresten.
     
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
  10. prime

    prime BOX! Writing Champion Full Member

    2,564
    90
    Feb 27, 2006
    Yes, Ali was an unorthodox boxer. His mantras were "Hit and not get hit" and "Protect this pretty face of yours." According to all accounts, he did what he wanted in the ring, which was usually against the grain, but he prevailed and of course knew of fundamental techniques and used them as he wished.

    I love to study Ali because he was so successfully versatile and improvisational in the ring: no heavy has ever had his fluid-motion rhythm which was his prime offensive and defensive foundation; that ring psychology; the rope-a-dope; his stupid-simple but so often unused defensive maneuver of moving away when hurt; his tactical clinching; punching to win rounds, particularly on the back foot, never to kill, always in control (clear when holding back against a falling Foreman and a stunned Shavers after 15).

    I agree Thrilla shows different aspects of his repertoire, particularly that Ali could fight inside, holding his own against a beast on the inside in Frazier, holding his hands in different defensive presentations.

    You will never look at Ali and see an orthodox boxer, just a master who refused to paint within the lines.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  11. godking

    godking Active Member Full Member

    1,140
    9
    Aug 21, 2006
    Those tricks worked because he lamost always had a signicant speed and footwork advantage .

    His moving away when hurt would cost him greatly against a fighter with the footwork and foot and handspeed to keep up with him like Tyson for instance.
     
  12. prime

    prime BOX! Writing Champion Full Member

    2,564
    90
    Feb 27, 2006
    Ali was safe when moving away from Frazier at FOTC, Holmes was safe when moving away from Tyson in '88, Tunney was safe when getting on the bike after the Long Count and, in my humble experience, moving is an instant respite after getting hit with a big one.

    Ali ridiculed Frazier for not moving away from Foreman in Jamaica after getting knocked down the first time, suggesting it is intelligent to let your head clear by putting some distance between you and your tormentor instead of just standing there and taking potentially definitive blows.
     
  13. godking

    godking Active Member Full Member

    1,140
    9
    Aug 21, 2006
    :roll: :roll: Sure its a good idea to move straight away from a punch wih your hands down.

    Ali got blasted hard twice with left hooks a punch he was very suspectible too by moving straight away By Cooper and by Frazier.

    moving straight away from a punch with your hands down is not a good defensive technique . It only works well if you are significantly faster then your opponent.

    Ali was great but a technically skilled fighter he was not.
     
  14. timmers612

    timmers612 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    416
    Sep 25, 2005
    The only big..change I ever saw in Ali fighting, and it was temporary, was I think in the Richard Dunn fight? As he was fighting a southpaw he took some training in Japanese karate to throw a straighter right hand, and I was impressed in how he threw it arrow straight in that fight. He didn't continue this though and it may have served him down the road had he.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    It's so funny that Tyson fan comes with thi criticism. When way past his prime Ali managed to get away from Shavers after being badly hurt. Who did Tyson ever get away from when he was hurt?

    Ali's technique was unorthodox, but one of the best a boxer ever has had. Tyson on the other had severly limited technique, because he could only fight in one fashion. When Ali no longer could rely on his footwork he developed a nigh impregnable gard. In Manilla, as earlier stated, he fought on the inside for the most part of the fight against one of the mos feroucious in-fighters ever (much better than Tyson for example) and succeeded, even if he paid a very high prize.

    His punches was very precise and he threw them from all angles, both in combinations and flurries. He's not known as a puncher, but he was the first to KO/TKO Liston, Bonavena, Foreman, Wepner and Lyle, and the only one to ever KO Bonavena, Foreman and Wepner. He was able to succesfully defend himself while scoring with effective counterpunches on the ropes for seven rounds against Foreman, one of the most feared punchers of all time. He outjabbed Liston, considered by many to have the greatest jab in HW-boxing (obviously they're wrong, but he still had a very good jab) etc, etc.

    He had som flaws (which I've high-lighted earlier in this thread) but all in all his technique was great, and he was one of the most inventive boxers to ever step into a ring. Just look at how he tries out a new way of blocking a punch against Ellis, or a new defensive posture in his second fight against Patterson. Only the narrow-minded fail to see how great Ali's technique was IMO.