Ali in his mid 30`s v Spinks from the mid 80`s who would have won?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Nov 9, 2020.


  1. BlackCloud

    BlackCloud I detest the daily heavyweight threads Full Member

    3,201
    3,373
    Nov 22, 2012
    Once a sore loser........

    All to easy.


    This content is protected
     
    mark ant likes this.
  2. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,325
    4,183
    Aug 2, 2013
    I despise Eubank Jr so keep it coming.

    I hurt you
     
  3. Richard M Murrieta

    Richard M Murrieta Now Deceased 2/4/25 Full Member

    22,635
    30,409
    Jul 16, 2019
    Muhammad Ali in his mid 30's was way too vulnerable for any opponent, not a fair question. What would happen if a prime Muhammad Ali from 1967 fought a Michael Spinks from the mid 1980's?
     
    Fergy likes this.
  4. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Ali would have beaten Spinks easily if they were same age and in their respective primes, Frazier would have destroyed Spinks.
     
    Richard M Murrieta likes this.
  5. Richard M Murrieta

    Richard M Murrieta Now Deceased 2/4/25 Full Member

    22,635
    30,409
    Jul 16, 2019
    Agreed.
     
    mark ant likes this.
  6. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,325
    4,183
    Aug 2, 2013
    No.
     
  7. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,325
    4,183
    Aug 2, 2013
    Total nonsense as usual
     
  8. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Spinks never fought a fighter that had Frazier`s work rate at heavyweight no way could Spinks have taken all the hooks Ali took off Frazier he was an elite fighter.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2020
  9. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,325
    4,183
    Aug 2, 2013
    You exaggerate all the time. There is no 'beat easily' or 'destroy' - there very very rarely is with top top fighters vs eachother.
     
  10. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Spinks never proved he was a top heavyweight and when therre is a huge gap in power and the ability to absorb power then there are plenty of one-side world title fights, Frazier threw far mor ppower shots than Spinks or anybody he faced.
     
  11. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,325
    4,183
    Aug 2, 2013
    Spinks was the Lineal Heavyweight Champion.

    ****ing hell.
     
  12. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    He beat Holmes when he was in his mid 30`s.
     
  13. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,325
    4,183
    Aug 2, 2013
    So. Holmes was the man. Holmes was the best ever.
     
  14. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Not in 1985, Hagler and Hearns were P4P rated far higher than Holmes by the mid 80`s.
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,823
    44,501
    Apr 27, 2005
    You were the one whining like a child about the forum so why don't you go?

    Mark's got you well and truly covered. He posts about much more than a micro era either side of the 90's between 160 - 168.
     
    mark ant likes this.