Ali is overrated: A cruiserweight the size of Chris Byrd with less athletic ability

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by edgewood, Jun 17, 2009.


  1. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    Fixed.
     
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    There's a decent argument for that. But comparing today's era with the 60-70's, one shouldn't forget that an ancient Holyfield really beat one of today's top HWs (Valuev). The same Holyfield who in his prime had at least some trouble with ancient versions of Foreman (who in his prime was beaten by an aging Ali) and Holmes (who once was Ali's sparring partner).
     
  3. AnthonyJ74

    AnthonyJ74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    53
    Feb 26, 2007
    Ali was 6'2"; his 6'3" measurement was inflated. Holmes and Foreman were legitimate 6'3" guys.
     
  4. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    Still, his reach was close to 80", and he certainly wasn't an undersized heavyweight by any means.
     
  5. Brady

    Brady Active Member Full Member

    521
    0
    Dec 5, 2008
    But Valuev is no where near the class of the Klitschkos. It's a tough situation because if there was a superheavyweight division, there really aren't too many fighters of that size to really make it a division. I think we are in a transitional period. Maybe in 10 years, there will be enough talented 230+ fighters to make a superheavyweight division practical. Right now, the Klits have to get their props for being the first men of that size in history to have such great boxing skills. As much as it pains me, h2h, the Klits would probably knockout most of the great heavyweights in history, and not let anyone else even get close to them. Ali may be the lone exception, but no one knows how Ali would handle a fighter like either of the Klits.

    P4P, they are not as impressive, but still very good. No hate.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yeah, this is hard to say. But let's do it like this: Vitaly lost to an old Lewis who when younger and better just narrowly edged Mercer who inturn clearly lost to a 40+ Holmes who... You get the picture.

    Also, Wlad was clearly beaten by guys that were very, very far from great. So it's not like these guys are unbeatable monsters. But yes, they look good in many h2h match-ups with their combination of size and skill.
     
  7. heehoo

    heehoo TIMEXICAH! Full Member

    3,763
    13
    Feb 16, 2008
    You cannot be serious.

    If you are, please leave this site and never come back. You don't boxing if that is the case.
     
  8. pugilist_boyd

    pugilist_boyd BUSTED UP PUG Full Member

    830
    3
    Jun 19, 2007
    prime ali would be wearing every heavyweight belt today-easily
     
  9. Svengali

    Svengali Guest

    Can you imagine Ali quitting on his stool, in his prime, BECAUSE HIS SHOULDER HURT!?!?!!?


    GTFO!
     
  10. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    H2H I would not make Ali too much of an underdog against Chris Byrd. He would have little chance against the Klitschko's as they are tall, and would be without hope against Valuev, who should unite the heavyweight titles sometime next year,
     
  11. ron u.k.

    ron u.k. Boxing Addict banned

    4,920
    12
    Feb 14, 2006
  12. kenmore

    kenmore Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,132
    28
    Jan 29, 2008
    Ali was more solidly built than Chris Byrd. Check the photos and the films; you can see more body mass, especially in the upper body, in Ali.

    I don't think Byrd could have survived the kind of physical beating that Ali took in the third Frazier fight.

    As for athletic ability, are you aware that Ali is generally regarded as one of the greatest athletes ever to fight at heavyweight? Ali's speed and fluidity were astounding; that's why Ali could get away with so many tricks that other fighters couldn't afford to try, such as leaning back from the jab, etc.
     
  13. ClintMagnum

    ClintMagnum Antitheist Full Member

    600
    1
    Jun 11, 2009
    Sometimes posts on this forum nearly take my breath away. Why start a post on a DISCUSSION forum starting with "I don't care what anyone says"....
    Anyone who makes such a foolish comment as the thread to this post is a) under the age of 24 b) Never fought a heavyweight c) no right calling himself a fan of pugilism.
    Size beyond 16 stone is irrelevant. Heart, stamina, skill, speed, chin, parries, slips,counters,etc, etc. Byrd isn't an ATG in this poor era. In the 1920's he'd have been picked apart and sparked by Jack Johnson (in round 25) , beaten to every punch by Louis, flattened and outworked by Marciano, KO'd in 3 by Foreman or Liston and utterly humiliated by a prime Holmes and Lennox Lewis.
    Crazy post mate.
     
  14. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Im guessing sarcasm ?
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,647
    46,297
    Feb 11, 2005
    Liston did.

    Although it's hard not to consider Ali over-rated (no, he did not **** rainbows) he was among the very toughest of all heavies, really amazingly tough.

    I do think he was a bit of a sham in the 70's but he also lost a good chunk of what should have been his prime.

    Wlad would have a chance against a prime Ali, but not a real big chance. Vit would get carved up. Against the 70's Ali, the chance gets quite a bit bigger.