Ali vs Bryant Jennings who wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dkeir, Jan 1, 2017.


Ali vs Bryant Jennings

  1. Ali

    31 vote(s)
    53.4%
  2. Bryant Jennings

    27 vote(s)
    46.6%
  1. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,541
    40,061
    Jan 22, 2015
    I'm shocked 21 posters actually picked jennings... what the hell are they smoking?
     
  2. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    These clowns won't dare show their name or their reasoning under their OG screen names.. It's so fake. I hate these kinds of bait threads because they are using their alt knowing that their real account would get trashed. They're saying anyone whose 230-240lbs and over beats legends and all time greats. Reasoning. Today's food, vitamins and machinery duh, lmao.

    It's almost sacrilege to move heavies through time and say that an average big heavy can beat them. That's weasel thinking. That's why I despise Zak and Rico. These clowns really don't ksab. Jennings can't rule during his era, but he would annihilate the past greats lol. Why? Size lmao...
     
    PIRA, DoubleJab666, reznick and 3 others like this.
  3. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,733
    6,148
    May 2, 2015
    Even George Foreman from early 90s would've throughly annihilated Jennings, It'd be very hard to watch. And that's coming from someone who rates Jennings and likes him a lot.
     
  4. pincai

    pincai The Indonesian Thin Man Full Member

    7,919
    10,460
    Jun 10, 2012
    Blurry old films scare the pants of them. Still need mommy cuddle after their first horror movie.
     
    drenlou, theanatolian and BlizzyBlizz like this.
  5. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,844
    15,621
    Nov 9, 2015
    This kind of thread and the 'thinking' behind tries to distill boxing down to a simplistic algorithm: Input, height, weight, age, etc of two fighters into a computer, crunch some numbers and... boom, you got the result perfectly predicted and supported by 'logic'. The mindset of the hipster boxing fan.

    But the biggest single deciding factor cannot be calculated this way. Talent. And what this subjective criteria tells me is, if you got a time machine and took Jennings back to the 70s to fight Ali, without the benefit of all the modern developments in training, nutrition etc he would lose. And put Ali in a time machine and take him to 2017 with the benefits of all the modern developments in training, nutrition etc.... and Jennings would still lose.

    Yes, the general direction of travel for all sports indicates performances improve as the decades pass so yes Jennings is better now than he would have been 50 years ago for all the reasons outlined but that does not mean he would be better than all those who boxed back then. That's an absurd conclusion.

    In short. Ali wins.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2017
    drenlou, PIRA, BlizzyBlizz and 2 others like this.