Ali vs Bryant Jennings who wins?

I've seen the video. It's good. I think Reznick posted it before. It explains how modern equipment training etc influences performances. But it still showed the raw phycial evolution of the athletes involved and how that effects the superior results. It's a real big change that's as apparent in hw boxing as any sport, and too much of an ask to older atgs like Ali to overcome.

 

Also, if it's an exaggeration, honestly, let me know one that exists pre 1985(IE Tyson) I looked in depth one time and couldn't find any. I'm not saying one doesn't exist, but it was about 0 for 80 or so of the records I've seen. A daunting precedent boxers would have to overcome

 

Chuck Wepner had better toughness , stamina , conditioning and endurance than a lot of the guys today.

He'd beat the current WBO title holder on grit , relentlessness and determination alone.

Make a Wilder vs Wepner thread. See how many votes he gets.

 

You can't beat me and im glad you realise that. These posts you keep repeating are basically tap outs.

 

What about Chuck Wepner? He was a terrible journeyman who got a shot based on a robbery over Ernie Terell which was allegedly so bad that Terrels trainer pulled a knife on the ref (who was the sole judge). Ali exposed of him accordingly.

 

Only in your sad little mind. I've beaten, embarrassed, and humiliated you time and again. Your just too emotionally and intellectually challenged to recognize it.

 

Your trying to reason with the least reasonable, least intelligent poster on the forum. Just insult him, it's all he understands.

 

Look at the boxrec warrior. What do you know about Bob Stalings? Nothing. You're talking about fights you've never even watched. Neither have i ,
But ive seen enough of Wepner to know he'd be a handful for many guys today.
Parker don't have the work rate to keep off a guy like Wepner who could keep coming at you for 15 rounds non stop. He'd run Parker into the ground after 6 rounds. Parkers conditioning and stamina are an embarrassment.
Look at the state of the guy he won the title from. Another guy Weper would mop the floor with.

 

Another tap out and total deflection of every thing you can't answer.

 

When is AndreWah going to answer this.

 

Jennings is a good fighter. Good speed, good wingspan, and even though he isn't particularly big by today's standards, he'd have been one of the bigger fighters in Ali's time. He's no joke.

 

Only tap out is from you, little fella. You fail to answer any of the substantive facts I put up that indicate modern he's are likely superior to past hws.
As far as Jennings to Norton, the op said it best. Wehm Ali finally faced a top level boxer of similar dimensions to him in Norton he struggled. Jennings is a top level boxer with greater dimensions than Norton. Deal with it.

 

Ali has something like a 22 -2 record against fighters ranked in the all time great list. But he loses to a guy who works part time in a bank today?
What about Pulev ? Does he beat Ali too?