Ali vs Bryant Jennings who wins?

Ortiz make a joke out of him , so yes , he is a joke. And i knew that before the Ortiz fight. You'd have to know ZERO about this sport not to how how basic and rudimentary he is.

 

Probably idiot. As I said, in every tangible based sport, the best of Ali's era aren't even top 15 nowadays in performance. Pulev beating Ali is t therefore the rational default assumption.

 

Your the only one whose only one whose shown zero knowledge of the sport, your credibility is non-existent and even other classicists think your a joke. Stop embarrassing yourself

 

Parker has the same dimensions as Jennings as is a world champion in this 'great era'. Something Jennings never was.

That means Parker would do a worse number on Ali than Norton and Jennings , correct?

 

Give a guy enough rope ....

 

Who thinks im a joke in the classic?

 

Ali wins by MD.

 

And youll continue to hang yourself. Your effort was transparent but pointless. Few arguing that Jennings would beat Ali wouldn't make the same argument about Pulev, who is usually considered better. Your imbecility strikes again

 

Actually, Parker's slightly bigger. But your confusing my point and your honestly too stupid for me to try and explain it.

 

Wepner was nothing more than a brief contender who never came close to becoming a champion. . People like Sam Peter and Charles Martin becoming World Champs proves how worse it is today.
All the top levellers - Whyte , Chisora , Parker , Ruiz Jr are struggling after 6 round fighting at a medium pace. Even Joshua looked out of gas for two rounds against Whtye. Wladimir get exhausted even when the fight is fought at his own pace.
None of them could keep up with Wepner over 15 round.
Even fatties like Buster Mathis had better stamina then the ripped lean guys of today, and better skills than a lot of them too.

 

The only guy hanging himself is the guy claiming Ali loses to Jennings and Pulev. You're doing my work for me at this stage.

 

So that means Ali gets it worse from Parker yeah?

 

No, that would be you moron. I've pointed out the facts that support that opinion. Clearly alot of people agree, even though it goes against conventional wisdom. You've only got personal opinion and insults. You don't do your side any credit. You should leave the arguing to the big boys who can actually make coherent points.

 

Not necessarily, your confusing the general for the specific, a common logical problem in the less intelligent. I'd explain it you you but it would be pointless due to you imbecility