Terrell was slow in the Ali fight. Didn’t he suffer an eye injury during the fight? I think so. Either way his jab was not in the class of the discussed super heavyweights.
There seems to be a some misconceptions regarding the 70s one of which is that they are not significantly smaller than todays heavies. For example I pointed out in an earlier post that the 70s heavies are much closer to the heavies of Marciano's era in size than todays heavyweights and people refused to accept it. But that's just the facts. If someone wants a year by year analysis I am happy to provide it.
A few things. Do you intend to give a reply showing us which top ten middles Hank beat? Ali was near pirime vs jones and Norton. In fact Norton did a number on Ali before he best Frazier or Foreman. Wrong, Terell did win a round vs Ali. Ali never fought a super heavy with a good jab, skills and a power punch. How many of those guys listed compare to Lewis, klitschko or Joshua? NONE.
Lyle was slower and he troubled Ali Lewis never lost on points. That was Mercer on a good night and he also had one of the best jabs in the 1990’s Just use logic, if good smaller jabers bothered Ali the best superheavyweight jabbers would do the same.
For example lets compare 2011 with 1971 2011 1.Wladimir Klitschko (242 1/2) 2.Vitali Klitschko (243-247 1/4) 3.Alexander Povetkin (227 3/4-231 1/2) 4.Tomasz Adamek (215-216) 5.Eddie Chambers (208) 6.Alexander Dimitrenko (250 1/4-252 3/4) 7.Robert Helenius (239 1/4-243 1/2) 8.Denis Boytsov (213 3/4) 9.Ruslan Chagaev (231 1/2) 10.Chris Arreola (234-249 3/4) 1971 1.Joe Frazier (205) 2.Muhammad Ali (215-227) 3.Jerry Quarry (198-203) 4.George Foreman (215-224) 5.Oscar Bonavena (?) 6.Mac Foster (221-222) 7.Jimmy Ellis (189-198) 8.Floyd Patterson (189-195) 9.Jose Luis Garcia (196) 10.Jack Bodell (201-205)
I'm also curious as to why some people seem to feel that a win over someone as tiny as Liston is relevant in todays division. Liston may have been some sort of big bad monster in his day but that wouldn't be the case today.
Actually it appears Foreman, Norton, and Williams did not have longer reaches than Ali. Ali's is listed as 79 while Norton's is 79, Foreman's 78 1/2 and Williams 78.
This is why I find it hard to entertain Mendoza's sentiment that Ali had trouble with good jabbers throughout his career, forgetting that he beat Liston, Foreman, Terrell - all of whom had very good to all time great jabs. When my dad first showed me how to box and made me sit down and study boxing film, he always said "If there's one punch you learn to throw properly, you learn how to jab". The jab is the most fundamental punch in boxing because if used properly, everything offensive and even defensively can be built around it. If there's one punch any boxer is likely to have issue with, it's the jab - it's the first learnt punch, it's perhaps the most practiced and most varied punch there is - there's no shame in having difficulty dealing with a good jab - it's all about who you beat, how you overcame adversity inside and sometimes outside the ring and what skillset we can see on film, as well as your ring record. Ali, in my humble opinion, moreso than the fighters of modern time showed more skills, more speed and had a better ring record versus a better calibre of top fighter than many of the fighters that he is compared to. I like Anthony Joshua, but I cannot see how a fighter so young in his career, so unproven, so stiff-looking, at times, in the ring should be compared in head to head fantasy fights against the likes of an Ali.
In the other currently running post, by whom I forget, it listed that the average weight of Ali's opponents was 203 pounds. That is essentially a cruiserweight.
I’ll take George Foreman’s word that the 70s had better boxers. He actually fought in both eras. Although he tends to embellish tales time to time. He said Liston was stronger then Briggs . I don’t get how small minded people can’t comprehend that 70s and prior era fighters are not coming in weighing what they weighed then. Hell Foreman was what 30 pounds heavier in the 90s? And if you were to take fighters from today and place them in the 70s they weigh considerably less. Besides not using weights championship contenders had to have better cardio for 15 rounds. Some fighters would drop to cruiser weight some would gain mass. I can see Ali weighing 230 today.
Foreman didn't fight in todays division, so how would he know what its like to fight the top guys of today?
I think boxrec is incorrect in this instance, early in his career it was given as 79 and then in the 70s it was listed as 80 inches. I don't know where they got 78 from.