I've never received an answer to this question. After the Lewiston fight, Ali revealed the secret of the "phantom punch". It was the Anchor Punch that had been taught to him by Black comedian Step 'n Fetchit who had learned it from Jack Johnson. Its a chop, so fast you cant see it, he said. Its karate. Its got a twist to it. Just one does the job. He added that "it will knock anybody out". Ali had another 29 or 30 fights left in his career. Only 3 lasted less than 4 rounds and only 3 were won by KO. Many of them went the distance of 12-15 rounds. He lost 5 of these subsequent fights. Why? Why didn't all of his fights end in 1 or 2 round KO victories? Why did he apparently only use his anchor punch in the Lewiston fight.
I don't think there's any big mystery to that - within a couple of years Ali himself had admitted there was no such thing. https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AIBAJ&sjid=DUcEAAAAIBAJ&pg=3052,2022917&hl=en
The punch landed solid. I've no doubt it hurt Liston. But after years if debating and watching it my focus shifted from the mechanics of the punch to mechanics of the reaction. Yes it was a solid punch, but no way was Liston knocked out. Even if he was dropped and was down for 12 or whatever, no count was applied so there's no reason for the result to stand. Liston breaks his fall, gets up out of shame, then covers on the ropes whilst he finds a way out. Of course it's all circumstantial and that's why no charges were brought forward, but I can't see it as legit. First fight I think Liston was older, lazier and complacent and Ali deserved the win. The rematch is a blotch on history.
Yeah definitely. The debate shouldnt centre around the punch landing or not, the hd footage proves it did. The debate should be about whether Liston was genuinely dropped and of he was, whether he was legitimately in no position to continue.
The debate about the "punch" took attention away from the real scandal, of Walcott's stopping the fight without a count. I don't think Liston was actually knocked down, but it doesn't really matter. It's what happened after Liston went down that should have brought on the outrage.
Yeah I'm not convinced on the legitimacy of the knockdown but there'll be plenty of knockdowns in boxing where the opponent could have stayed on his feet had he really wanted to. What bothers me is the way he rolls around, the way he breaks his fall, the way Walcott conducts the none count, the way the time keeper intervenes.even assuming there's no fix (which I know you dont)there is still too much wrong to give Ali overt credit.
Here's something else to think about: Walcott and Ali's behavior. They both went semi-nuts when Liston went down. Ali was dancing around the ring and screaming at Liston. Walcott acted like an animal caught by a set of headlights. Why? What is so unusual about a fighter getting knocked down? Why did they both go into panic mode over a common happening? I suggest they had been told something different would happen or that it would happen in a different way. I can think of no other explanation.
I'd put it more down to the incredulity that it was the first round. Liston was a monster. Ali was an untested gob ****e. Liston was favourite for the rematch and seemed to train very hard and take it seriously. For a monster to go down and stay down from a sharp counter punch was incredulous. I don't buy into talk of a conspiracy involving Ali and Jersey. I remember a few years ago we had this same debate going down the lines of conspiracy talk. Liston might well have dived, not sure to what end but given his connections that isn't a big leap. The way he was shunned from the rankings for 5 years suggests those in the know think he tanked it as well. I just don't see Ali and Jersey being involved.