All 3 judges for the AA vs Dirrell fight from Michigan! AA camp angry.

Dirrell is still overmatched on this fight, the fight won't be close imo and the only way they'll give it to Dirrell is if it's close.

 

It won't matter , AA is putting him to sleep . Aa is no plodding slugger like froch. He'll find dirrell and when he does , injuries might occur

 

Because you seem to talk alot of nonsense and never actually wanna back up what you're saying.

Boxing scoring is not subjective. There is rigid criteria.

1. Clean effective punching
2. Effective Aggression (notice it says Effective, that means simply coming forward and winging punches is not effective aggression)
3. Defense(I know a shock to you probably)
4. Ring generalship(Again this doesnt mean that the aggressive fighter is the ring general, its the fighter that is able to control the ring)

Thats why judges and fans fail. They think they can make up their own criteria for judging. That they can favor the aggressive fighter simply because he's aggressive, not taking into account he is missing all his punches.




As for Witter vs Bradley. It was not close. There is no way you can logically give the fight to Witter. And yeah, some fights are robberies. I thought Funeka vs Guzman was fairly close given Guzmans early work, but there is no way in hell he won 7 rounds to win that fight. Same with Froch vs Dirrell. There is no way in hell froch won enough rounds to win that fight.

Just because a fight is close, doesnt mean its not a robbery. And usually in close fights that are robberies if you look at the judges scorecards, they arent giving the close rounds to the hometown fighter but rounds the hometown fighter got shellacked in. See the Italian judge giving Froch round 11 vs Dirrell.

 

wow.. not true. i say good things about duddy gatti ward malignaggi both klitschko brothers marciano baer primo jack d... i was all aboard for pavlik untill he faded out in my mind with his afflictions and decisions he makes.
the klitschko brothers are boring..i am not impressed with bute....arthur abraham i don't like. kessler is ok...calzaghe is alright.

I like to watch the sport as entertainment...and also i enjoy watching the skill put forth.. I am white and i don't hate white boxers..I just like to be impressed...and if white black or spanish or purple boxers put forth the effort..they get my vote.

I was hoping gatti would put it on mayweather...really hoping...but i faced reality..and was saddened by the outcome of that one.

Abraham is tough and valiant...did his thing with a broken jaw. i just don't want to hear him verbally blow america... and wear some **** a king would wear...and go to a stadium and say..i want to be lowered down into the arena with lazers going off like madonna did.(his own words)

I want the american dirrell to win...and i want the american malignaggi to win.
nothing special about that choice.

don't mind me ....i'm having some colt 45 right now.:rasta

 

Ofcourse boxing scoring is subjective....

There is supposed "rigid criteria", but with a 10 point must system.... Its very subjective.....

You seem to have all of these utopian perfect world theories of the way things should be done..... Well wake up... thats not how **** is done is the real world

 

Actually AA is a plodding slugger. He's flat footed, throws wide punches behind a very good shell defense.

Dont know what else you could describe him as.

 

You're right.

Froch is actually a plodding boxer puncher.

 

AGain defending horrible decisions just to push your silly boxing views.

The reason why scoring is bad in boxing is because alot of judges arent even fans of boxing, there is no real criteria to be a judge in boxing, as to why the bull**** decisions that defy logic. You're ok with that though, because scoring is subjective when its not supposed to be.

**** man, one you start favoring one thing over the other, that pretty much creates bias, jesus its not a hard concept to grasp.

 

Pretty much. For all of Froch's goofyness, he has a insane jab thats hard to handle because of is freakish wing span.

 

You are way too egotistic to even see a opninion that is other than your own, it might work for you now. But it will seriously impede your growth.

I see the way other people score a fight, and I take a mental note of that, and reevaluate the way I score a fight.... I grow and expand by the day, you are stuck in the same place, see the differnece?

 

I actually think froch's jab sucks, and froch knows this.... Which is why he waits for people who try to counter it, with a counter.....

Froch is a very smart guy, i saw some documentray thing on him, and he actually writes down like a page worth of notes after every training session

 

I'm a fan of adversity...

we should be seeing what arthur abraham thinks about this... how he will prevail.. how no matter what they stack against him he will succeed. we don't get that. showtime sleeps ... not even a 360 special for the upcoming fight.

he's another clottey...tough shell guy that prays his opponent gets gassed out and sloppy
Dirrell is more the david to abraham being the goliath packing that k.o. punch.
go black guy!

 

It hardly ever lands but its so long its good at pushing the other fighter backwards. Like against Pascal and Dirrell

 

At the end of the day bradley got the nod in the belt holders hometown in a close fight, which was right

A lot of the rounds in the froch dirrell fight were almost impossible to score as both of them were so bad in them, half the rounds could have gone either way so in this type of fight it is not a robbery

 

Count who's actually landing punches and its cake.