All Fights should be 60/40 splits...???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by #1Rounder, May 22, 2009.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    imagine the uproar when there is a robbery
     
  2. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    No huge star agree to those terms.
     
  3. beef_frank26

    beef_frank26 New Member Full Member

    52
    0
    Sep 27, 2011
    Yeah they do. But bonuses won't work in sports where there is a solo winner. Their endorsement contracts might have bonuses but those earnings off of a fight or a match are usually a fixed amount.

    They should have a 60/40 split for earnings because if you lose, you shouldn't get an equal share of the revenue. But I do agree with some that it would make a lot of people unhappy.
     
  4. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    This is one of the worse ideas floating around this board. For years there was the Oscar sweepstakes. A fighter getting a 10% split fighting Oscar would get the biggest payday of their lives. The point is if a fighter is in higher demand why should they not get the lion share of the take? Perhaps maybe a 5-10% float going to the winner but its all about who has the name and is the bigger draw. Those things have to be decided on a case by case basis
     
  5. paulko

    paulko Active Member Full Member

    775
    0
    Jun 18, 2011
    Got to agree
     
  6. benner

    benner Active Member Full Member

    982
    0
    Apr 22, 2012
    Horrible plan.
     
  7. Steven.Jackson

    Steven.Jackson Mr. Chicken Full Member

    1,591
    20
    Aug 10, 2011
    What's the difference between this and 60/40 to the winner?
     
  8. VBOX

    VBOX JOURNEYMAN Full Member

    5,812
    3,955
    Feb 8, 2012
    No offence to the OP but I don't like it at all. Atleast not mandatory. They can write up whatever kind of split or bonus they want as long as it's agreed upon. If you want more money then start putting more butts in seats.
     
  9. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    hell no. So Wladimir should split 60/40 with his next opponent?

    Dumb idea
     
  10. PrinceN

    PrinceN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,987
    2
    Jul 24, 2011
    so you dont want to see the best fights happen?
     
  11. New England

    New England Member Full Member

    218
    0
    Mar 29, 2012
  12. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    wlad vs the bum he is fighting, does that guy deserve 40?

    Guerrero does he deserve 50 for fighting floyd, PBF deserves more because he has worked at his craft longer, he has done a better job at it, nobody knows Guerrero - thats why they have to pull **** like the Gun incident to get headlines, Most know floyd.

    Whilst I agree on big fights & evenly matched (on ability and attraction power) fights should be like that, e.g. pac vs floyd, ward vs Froch, Froch vs Bute, Mathysse vs Peterson, Haye vs wlad etc...
     
  13. irishny

    irishny Obsessed with Boxing banned

    15,119
    10
    May 8, 2009
    If only Bernard Hopkins would have seen this logic,we would have seen a rematch with RJJ when they were both in their prime.

    60/40 I kick yo' ass!
     
  14. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    We have had some Good match-ups in recent years! The biggest star and the odds favorite should get the bigger purse!
     
  15. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Srl...Tyson...De la hoya all got the biggest purses cause they we're the stars!