All great heavyweights have a big win over a top challenger -- What about the Klits?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by charlie brown, Oct 17, 2010.


  1. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,405
    11,430
    Jan 6, 2007
    A dictionary wouldn't help you, boy.

    You're too obtuse to follow along.



    There was **** all wrong with his grammar.

    He just didn't appear to know the meaning of the word 'viable' as he stated that Vitali was Wlad's most viable opponent.
     
  2. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,405
    11,430
    Jan 6, 2007

    You're not having a very good day, R.

    That's two in a row you haven't grasped.

    There, there, now, I'll explain it for you.

    Nice and slowly.

    CB stated:

    Then he stated:


    As if the second followed from the first.




    Glad to help out the mentally challenged when I can.
     
  3. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Tyson's win over Spinks was very good, I don't see how anyone can **** on it, Spinks was great at LHW, moved up and was the first man to beat Holmes, he then went on to have several more defenses and had become a proven HW. Before the fight there were alot of people who thought Spinks would beat Tyson.
     
  4. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    The Klits HW resume is shitty to say the least. There both descent guys but in any other era they would have been journeymen.
     
  5. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    Dude...lets slow down here, I mean it's one thing to insult me, it's one thing to disregard and disrespect my opinion, but it's an entirely different deal to start disrespecting the things people care most about. Darren Mcfadden is one of the greatest college football players in SEC history! :yep
     
  6. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    That was really sweet, I mean you and relentless had a "moment"...awwww, get a room you ****ing ***gots. What makes your "moment" more gay, is that you're ****ing wrong! Either way, I'm a romantic at heart, I hope things work out for ya'll, I'm not anit-****** in the sense of homosexual butt sex and the like...that's completely ya'lls business not exactly my thing, but hey if you wanna garggle seaman and devour uncircumcised cocks you should be able to regardless if the rest of the world thinks you are a sick, twisted, disgusting ****. I am anti-****** in the sense of someone just being a dick sucking douche bag, just to be a dick sucking douche bag, with no real point, rhyme, or reason. Either way **** the Klitschko's, what's important is the union of these two men, a bond that will stand the test of time, two men bravely blazing trails that give hope and direction to other little ***gots all over the world. Good **** fellas, keep us updated on how it's going, sincerely wish you the best.
     
  7. eagleskins

    eagleskins Active Member Full Member

    1,478
    0
    Oct 5, 2010
    Tyson never even beat a C fighter. Worst HW era of all time in the late 80's.
     
  8. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Klitschkos are the very best and by far!!!!!!!
     
  9. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    I'd be the first to say that Tyson's initial heavyweight run is MASSIVELY overrated. But your statement is untrue.