*All* judges and refs should be subject to interviews on camera

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boxed Ears, Dec 5, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. tojikiston

    tojikiston Contender Full Member

    1,179
    1
    Aug 3, 2009
    Let's lynch the ****ers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Drag them to the ring and pummel them to the bloody pulp live on TV, so others will learn!!!!!!!!!!!
     
    tojikiston, Dec 5, 2009
    tojikiston, Dec 5, 2009
    #16
  2. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,136
    10,553
    Jul 28, 2009
    I have to agree about the open scoring but it's jut an opinion. I can see a case being made for it too. I don't prefer it though.
     
    Boxed Ears, Dec 6, 2009
    Boxed Ears, Dec 6, 2009
    #17
  3. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    I do not care about interviews.

    I think judges should be liable to pay a jobbed fighter an amount commenserate with lost revenue do to biased or crooked scoring.

    Judges should be liable to criminal prosecution for fraud.

    Judges should be subject to life time bans from boxing at the first sign of hanky panky.

    Julie Lederman did a better job than this french guy. Now do the math on that one!
     
    booradley, Dec 6, 2009
    booradley, Dec 6, 2009
    #18
  4. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    There is an ongoing problem with the judges in nearly every fight and nothing is being done to change it.
     
    maciek4, Dec 6, 2009
    maciek4, Dec 6, 2009
    #19
  5. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,136
    10,553
    Jul 28, 2009
    I'm not too surprised three people voted they didn't think it would really change anything. Maybe it wouldn't but I'd be very hopeful that it would.
     
    Boxed Ears, Dec 6, 2009
    Boxed Ears, Dec 6, 2009
    #20
  6. silly_illy

    silly_illy Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,728
    2
    Feb 5, 2008
    HELL YEA!!!! :twisted::twisted::twisted:
     
    silly_illy, Dec 6, 2009
    silly_illy, Dec 6, 2009
    #21
  7. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Man they should ALWAYS have the judges in the ring when championship cards are read. If a card is way off? Let the media jump right down their throats!

    More importantly judges need to be certified and licensed. If you turn in a reasonably suspect card? Whatever you are paid is put on hold if there is a "justified dispute". If it is found that your judging was horrible? You forfeit the purse to the fighter and your license is suspended. Do it enough? You lose your license FOREVER.

    Judging, like anything else, will always be crooked if there are more benefits in corruption than in playing it straight.
     
    bald_head_slick, Dec 6, 2009
    bald_head_slick, Dec 6, 2009
    #22
  8. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    Not at all, are you going to hold every other official in every other sport accountable too? home cooking goes on, it's a fact of life and is accepted.
     
    Pug1list, Dec 6, 2009
    Pug1list, Dec 6, 2009
    #23
  9. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Get rid of criminal judges.
     
    Farmboxer, Dec 6, 2009
    Farmboxer, Dec 6, 2009
    #24
  10. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,136
    10,553
    Jul 28, 2009
    You're against holding officials accountable and it's acceptable to score fights with an extreme bias? That's interesting...:huh
     
    Boxed Ears, Dec 7, 2009
    Boxed Ears, Dec 7, 2009
    #25
  11. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    It's a subjective sport, every round is up to interpretation, no way you can hold judges accountable.
     
    Pug1list, Dec 7, 2009
    Pug1list, Dec 7, 2009
    #26
  12. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    I call BS. There is a difference in interpretation and robbery. When anyone with an eye sees a even fight and one judge has a guy pitching a shut out that is a REASONABLE reason to have the card reviewed.

    That last few fights Cotto/Clottey, Malignaggi/Diaz, Williams/Martinez etc... all fight fans could be OK with them going either way. It is always that one judges card that shows you that one guy never even had a chance.
     
    bald_head_slick, Dec 7, 2009
    bald_head_slick, Dec 7, 2009
    #27
Page 2 of 2