All of Pacquaio's recent opponents were coming off recent losses

In other words thread starter wants PAC to fight the likes of Valero!:rofl

Based on PAC's achievment he won countless awards and recognition.

NOW, TELL ME WHO SHOULD PAC HAVE FOUGHT INSTEAD?!
Lets start the ball rolling after his loss to Morales. He has eleven straight wins.
WHO ARE THOSE ELEVEN FIGHTERS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN HIS OPPONENT?
LETS SEE HOW SMART OR STUPID YOU ARE?! NAME THOSE ELEVEN SHOULD HAVE BEEN OPPONENTS?!

 

Pac is a great fighter but Floyd is going to out box him and just clearly **** him up. Not one Floyd fan has any tension or even is worried. I saw what I had to see in the Cotto fight. Cotto is a macho idiot and he let that interfere with whatever gameplan is needed to beat Pac. Floyd naturally fights the way to beat Pac. Dont engage and get that man started b/c once he gets those punches flying something is going to land and land hard. Floyd can beat him at range and in very close when he actually utilizes something called clinching or tying the other guy up occasionally to keep them off their rhythm. Pac cant lure Floyd into the brawl that he needs to win. Hatton tried to initiate a brawl with pac and got laid out. Cotto stood there too long after he got his shots off. Pac looks great when the other guy plays ball and get in to the macho slugfests.

 

Since we all know it's a disaster for PBF to engage in a brawl. His punches to is not as often as pac. His offense is a bore but i acknowledge he has the ability to win but to make the fight exciting in another story..

PAC throws more punches on the ave than pbf
PAC engages in toe to toe with his opponent. PBF doens't
PAC is known for his offense, Pbf is more known for his defense

In other words, out box means...punch then run run run run run run run run then punch one-tow then run run run run run run run run run run run.

Simple honest to goodness simple defenition of out box. NOW, can you clearly explain your defenition of out box?!

 

Everyone on this site is guilty of this. Everyone. Myself included. You included.

 

No, not the way *******s do it. I've seen *******s call Cotto, Duran, Chavez, etc... bums!!!!

 

Well my guess is that they respond like that only when
pac is being dissed or discredited for his wins...
of course youll have to defend your fav fighter, that is their style,
you have yours, i have mine, everyone does that anyways...
and calling the above bums hmmm dont know why would we
even believe what their saying, i think even they dont believe that,
its just like their trying to get into the critics nerves and
they are really good on that...:good

 

atsch

Join date: May 2009

You've been here long enough to know *******s are pretty ignorant. Hell, we have *******s that admit that they ONLY watch boxing for Manny, which is fine, but then they turn around and disrespect fighters! :nono

Why would ANYONE want to be good at being annoying little twats???:nut

Further comfirms *******s are dumb childish bitches. :good

 

Yes, i joined only last may, but ive been browsin this site long
before that to know what you're saying about the *******s...
And you say *******s are dumb childish bitches but are you
sure youre not acting like them?

 

I have never ever called a top level fighter a bum for the sake of upping any of my favorite.

I have never said I only like ONE particular fighter only to turn around and call some great fighters bums.

I have never sried to admin because I got my little fwelling hurt :|

Thanks for the lecture Mom. :good

 

Despite losing to Raheem ... Morales was the best win of all those fighters ... and probably the most competetive.

 

I wouldn't say best as in career defining, because after all, Morales was not only coming off a loss to a journey man, but he had also recently lost to Barrera is a devastating war, and was CLEARLY at the very end of his career.

So yes, a nice win to avenge his loss, but not necessarily career defining win.

 

Don't forget Barrera II, who was just coming off a lost to Marquez. Nah that has nothing to do with Pacquiao kickin their ass, he was just better than those guys in some way.

They wouldn't have made the fights if it was evident that they were shot ... many of those guys were exposed before they fought Pacquiao but weren't any worse off than when they took a loss.

Hatton didn't take a beating at all and it looked painless ... all that was missing was a pillow and some sheep with numbers.

Cotto took a worse beating against Margarito ...

Barrera never had heart and it took Junior Jones to truly expose that ...

Diaz didn't have a chance, it was just a chance at him to crack a 7-figure payday and be another champion on Pac's resume.

I don't think he beat Morales (Diaz) ... he was way more beat up and he looked scared when Morales confronted him.

Solis was undefeated

Larios won a title since losing to Pac ...

 

How many threads like this do we see on boxing forums and how often do they actually prove anything?

The fact is you can pick apart any great fighters resume. It's pretty easy to do if you try hard enough.