All the so called "boxing authorities" were wrong, Spence couldn't destroy Porter

Not that I'm an authority of anything. But come on, as far as breakdowns go. Mine was pretty goddamn close to spot on, give me a little love in retrospect.

Excellent question, it deserves far more attention than it's getting, and I genuinely think it's not even close to a foregone conclusion. Although with Porter, that's not a shock, I'm pretty sure I was one of the only people on here that without hesitation picked him to maul Broner, and thought that his match with Thurman was going to be Keith toughest test, that he might not pass. And he barely did.

Although very hesitant. I'm actually leaning Porter by KO. Now hear me out, and no I'm not crazy. Porter is rugged, is a solid inside fighter, is tough as nails with an amazing chin. He fights well on the front foot and on the back foot. He's unorthodox, awkward and very unpredictable. Sure you may say he looked horrible against Ugas, well Ugas just dominated Figueroa from start to finish in their match, and did an excellent job nullifying everything Omar attempted to do. I figured he'd win, but not that decisively. Ugas is huge for the division, hit's hard, and is an excellent counter-puncher. Arguably more skilled than Spence. So the fact that Porter did as well against him is he did, is very impressive. Spence has never faced an opponent that wasn't either shot, too small or compromised. The one good opponent he's had that was compromised, took 5 to 6 rounds off of him, and stunned him a time or two.

Great he was able to take the power of Mikey Garcia, so did Adrien Broner and Sergey Lipinets, and that was at 140. Mikey's power clearly didn't follow him up in weight, just like with Broner's. So the reality is, that was Triple G vs Kell Brook, only without the KO or the marauding much larger man actively seeking a KO walking through bombs. The amount of respect that Spence showed a pune like Mikey was shocking. How many people have said that Spence isn't a big puncher? Maybe you guys should start listening to them.

As close as the matches Porter had with Thurman and Garcia were, both of whom are elite opponents, along with his close match against Ugas who's a stylistic nightmare for most. Should tell you that Porter is a little underrated in the skills department. Yes Spence is decent, but the reality is, he's not anywhere close to being special, he's just a big guy in the division who throws a lot of punches, while he has decent footwork, and cuts the ring off quite well, he doesn't bring anything to the table a guy who shared the ring with Brook, Thurman or Garcia hasn't already had to deal with before.

Porter can be quite cagey, hard to time, and nearly impossible to get the rhythm of. He simply will not do what every other opponent of Spence has done before. It took Spence about five rounds to adjust to the one twos of Kell Brook, how the hell is he going to adjust Porter who can change his incredibly erratic style from round to round?

As a southpaw Spence is going to be wide open for Porter's lunging right hook, and when it lands it's going to be neck wrenching, the kind that can cause concussions. Also his body is going to be open for that right hook as well. Another thing, how good is his gas tank? Because you've never seen anybody bring the fight to him, push the pace, and truly tax his ass. Porter will.

I have no idea how this match will play out, but what I do know is it will not be a walk in the park for either man.

 

I was ****ing around, check the RBR. Yes, clearly Porter is a monster, and I find it hilarious that so many gave him little to no chance. But by the standard set by some of the kooks on here. He did in fact get exposed, by a top 3 or 4 Welterweight they gave no chance to. Personally I do think Spence is vastly overrated, and Porter is vastly underrated and they met somewhere in the middle tonight. They're both solid Welterweights. Spence proved he was beatable and very human. Hopefully it grounded a few of the maniacs who had him beating Mayweather and Trinidad with ease a year or so ago.

 

Good catch, fixed.

 

Ah, the germ of that abortion of a thread you made today. If you cab't tell the difference between Usyk and Bute, then this thread couldn't more appropriate for you. You fit in perfectly with its prime targets.